Caporegime
- Joined
- 13 May 2003
- Posts
- 34,520
- Location
- Warwickshire
Stoinis seeing them home
.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acff2/acff25e8e0f3553880111f7dfb81686cf78ab820" alt="Frown :( :("
Thought he was incredibly lucky, Stoinis missed out on two length balls and a full toss, he should've been taking at least two boundaries from those three balls. Excellent last delivery, but he was lucky Stoinis wasn't at it otherwiseGreat stuff from Curran after getting nailed for 6 first ball of the over.
Thought he was incredibly lucky, Stoinis missed out on two length balls and a full toss, he should've been taking at least two boundaries from those three balls. Excellent last delivery, but he was lucky Stoinis wasn't at it otherwise
I agree - but that doesn't mean Curran closed it out well, it means Stoinis bottled itIt's just pure pressure, he was swinging all over the place.
I agree - but that doesn't mean Curran closed it out well, it means Stoinis bottled it
As ever it's a little more complex than binary fault apportionment.I agree - but that doesn't mean Curran closed it out well, it means Stoinis bottled it
Well yes, of course. But equally saying that he bowled brilliantly it the death, which is what I was responding to, is off the mark. There was at least one more boundary for the taking in that over and it wasn't takenAs ever it's a little more complex than binary fault apportionment.