Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Apr 2004
- Posts
- 4,390
- Location
- Oxford
Okay, so why lose the right to do it in the EU? Surely, you see it's a big benefit to us?
Are you saying theirs no consequences or negatives to open borders ?
Okay, so why lose the right to do it in the EU? Surely, you see it's a big benefit to us?
The whole point of democratic accountability is that we the people can vote in and vote out individuals who sit at the top of the food chain, and who make policy. Just imagine if Cameron was appointed and we could not vote him out?
The EU Commissioners are appointed: We can not hold them to account. The people can not hold them to account, no matter their screw ups. That's bad for policy. The old tired and lame reply "but they are appointed by democratically elected politicians" does not wash at all.
It's cute that you think an independent UK could play in the same arena as countries of that size. It explains a lot, actually.
It's cute that you think an independent UK could play in the same arena as countries of that size. It explains a lot, actually.
Agreed! Because you appear to be unable to explain the significance of and reason for your comment, I'm unable to be specific as to why I'm 'stumped'
It's cute that you think we'll have more influence as 1/28th of the EU, with influence diminishing even further as more countries join the sinking ship...a ship Germany is the Captain of...
Anyone else notice how obtuse the remainers have got?
Pot, kettle.
Are you saying theirs no consequences or negatives to open borders ?
Reckon we'd still be 5th if we left? I very much doubt it.
And this is based on the last time the EU's 2nd largest contributer left?An article by the economist
"So Brexiteers may hope instead for a bespoke deal for Britain that gives access to the single market without EU rules, free movement of people or budget contributions. But this is a delusion. The EU cannot be generous to a post-Brexit Britain for fear that others (including the EEA) might demand the same. As evidence, consider what happened when the Swiss voted in early 2014 to restrict migration from the EU. The EU has refused even to discuss it: if the Swiss impose restrictions, they will lose access to the single market immediately"
Brexiteers living in ****oo land if they think they can force the EU to accept terms.
I've explained my argument, now tell me how we have more influence as 1/28th of a German dominated EU?
I doubt it as well. I think within 5 years of Leaving the EU we'll have overtaken Germany.
Why do you think that Germany which is 1/28th of the EU is captain of the ship, but think that the UK which is also 1/28th of the EU, has the EU's second most powerful military, second largest economy and third largest population has no influence?
I've explained my argument, now tell me how we have more influence as 1/28th of a German dominated EU?
Thank you Lt_Red very much appreciated , I've kept the full quote in my reply so it hopefully doesn't get lost in all the replies to this thread.
Thank again for taking the time to write those points down
WRONG!
Legislation is "initiated" by the unelected EU Commission. The elected representatives can only pass and modify it, they cannot 'create' it.
Forgot to mention
OUT
Cons.
Money Markets will hammer the pound on leaving as they do not care about Brexit, Exit or Weetabixonly how they can make a profit from the situation.
(Similar to ERM exit)
BofE needs to prop up pound using rate rises and reserves.
Cost of Borrowing rises making repayments more expensive.
Surge in house repossessions as people not able to afford the repayments at higher rates.
Balance of Payments crisis probable
As Brexit is a big leap into the unknown will we really be better off?
We don't. I never said we did
My point is that whilst we might be the 5th largest economy in the world right now, that has been built upon and manifested as a result of being part of the EU and in turn, the EU with the rest of the world. We've got into the position we are in by being a part of that.
Leaving what has given us this advantage to 'go it alone' has already caused rifts economically and we haven't even left yet. The repercussions will be much more long term and I very much doubt the UK would remain anywhere near the 5th largest economy what with having to renegotiate trade deals with individual countries etc. It's delusional to think that we'd have anywhere near as much influence as we do in the EU if we were out.
We're in this position to begin with because of Imperialism and the Industrial Revolution - you know when we looked beyond Europe and controlled our own destiny. Looking outward allowed us to punch well above our weight for centuries and continues to do so.
I think the effect long term will be positive.
What rifts economically? If Europe is upset, then give us our borders and our democracy back and we'll happily stay in a trade block. If it wasn't for the power greedy Feds, and if we'd stayed as a trading community, there would have been no need for a referendum.
It's delusional to think we'll have more influence as 1/28th of a German run EU than standing on our own and pursuing our own interests not those of the Brussels Feds.