The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

Dicehunter · 2 Jul 2015 at 00:55

If you zoom in you can actually see more detail in the distance in the TX portion.

shankly1985 · 2 Jul 2015 at 00:57

Dicehunter said:
If you zoom in you can actually see more detail in the distance in the TX portion.

The distance looks the same to me. what does stand out though is how clear the FX looks vs TX.. See writing on building etc stands out better on the FX shots.

Dicehunter · 2 Jul 2015 at 00:58

shankly1985 said:
The distance looks the same to me. what does stand out though is how clear the FX looks vs TX.. See writing on building etc stands out better on the FX shots.

So you can't see the missing building then ?

Building in the background in the TX and not there in the FX portion.

Gregster · 2 Jul 2015 at 00:59

AMD do have a better out the box picture IQ. That I will say.

shankly1985 · 2 Jul 2015 at 00:59

Dicehunter said:
So you can't see the missing building then ?

Building in the background in the TX and not there in the FX portion.

Its there for me? lol

Gerard · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:00

Missing building? :confused:

Dicehunter · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:01

shankly1985 said:
Its there for me? lol

We must be looking at 2 different pictures then.

Gerard said:
Missing building?

Well not missing but not at clear as the Titan X portion.

Mauller · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:02

Dicehunter said:
So you can't see the missing building then ?

Building in the background in the TX and not there in the FX portion.

I think you need to double check your brightness and contrast settings. There is a building in the FX picture. but it is more obscured in the mist.

Ayahuasca · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:02

It's there in both pictures it's just lighter on the fury x.

Orangey · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:03

Is it 2004 and comparing IQ of X800 vs 6000 series all over again?

Dem HL2 telephone wires, mang.

shankly1985 · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:03

Dicehunter said:
We must be looking at 2 different pictures then.

Well not missing but not at clear as the Titan X portion.

Well the difference here, could be easy change by simple Contrast change.. High contrast here will crush white etc

Dicehunter · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:04

Mauller said:
I think you need to double check your brightness and contrast settings. There is a building in the FX picture. but it is more obscured in the mist.

That's what I meant but still kind of missing compared to the TX portion.

Gregster · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:04

Chaps, don't argue over this please. It was 2 straight and fair runs on both. I didn't set the colour on the Nvidia run is the only difference.

Now can anyone tell me the performance hit of GVR please or do i need to find out for myself?

brit~XR · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:05

I loved this card and its looks and temps but mine had such a high pitch tone coming from it during desktop use then notice some kind of buzzing sound after few hours of gaming so decided to rma it. Removed my card last night and installed my 7950. watched a few tv shows on pc and shut down my pc to sleep.

Then i notice 14hours later my pc didn't actually shutdown and was still switched on. Didn't notice prob because i got used to the noise from the fury x. and had room cooling fan on all night.

Nice card and could see myself using 2 of them in crossfire if that noise problem gets fixed. But had few stutter issues on gta 5. Wasn't sure if it was the card or my i5 3570k on windows 8.1

Gonna wait a bit then decide if to order new one

Mauller · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:06

What could be making the difference is the angle and distance from the building.
In the FX shot he is slightly further back compared to the TX image. So he could be at the fade in distance.

but there are still things closer to him that are far more blurred in the TX shot. But it could be a motion blur artifact.

Dicehunter · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:07

Gregster said:
Chaps, don't argue over this please. It was 2 straight and fair runs on both. I didn't set the colour on the Nvidia run is the only difference.

Now can anyone tell me the performance hit of GVR please or do i need to find out for myself?

A few charts here

http://www.gamersnexus.net/game-bench/1561-shadowplay-vs-fraps-vs-gvr-recording-benchmark

Anything from 1% to 10% with GVR.

Gregster · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:09

Dicehunter said:
A few charts here

http://www.gamersnexus.net/game-bench/1561-shadowplay-vs-fraps-vs-gvr-recording-benchmark

Anything from 1% to 10% with GVR.

Ta mate. I think i will be using GVR and ShadowPlay to record the 1440P action. 1080P is just so meh lol

Boomstick777 · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:13

Dicehunter said:
If you zoom in you can actually see more detail in the distance in the TX portion.

No look here (Pic Below), it's as if the draw distance isn't as far on Titan. Details are actually missing. Watch the video it's really clear.

Not suggesting this is Gregster's doing, more an Nvidia thing lol. Def weird this.

Dicehunter · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:17

Boomstick777 said:
No look here (Pic Below), it's as if the draw distance isn't as far on Titan. Details are actually missing. Watch the video it's really clear.

Not suggesting this is Gregster's doing, more an Nvidia thing lol. Def weird this.

Very funky looking, some tom foolery going on here.

We need some more testers

Mauller · 2 Jul 2015 at 01:19

it that picture, even the texture for the tiles on the edge of the pavement looks better on the FX.