• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

shankly1985 said:
No am just pointing out they is other options out there and not just HDMI 2.0 that you seem to believe is the end all for anyone wanting 4K TV and AMD GPU!

They is always other options!
Click to expand...

Yes BUT if you are creating a 4K graphics card in the year 2015 why stick a 6 year old HDMI 1.4a port on it that is only capable of displaying 4k at 30hz and about as much use as a chocolate ashtray?

Here is an idea, all new 4K TV's sold today are HDMI 2.0 compatible, crazy I know but hear me out! Why not stick a HDMI 2.0 port on the Fury X card? I keep saying it but that is pure incompetence right there :p
 
Firefox35 said:
Yes BUT if you are creating a 4K graphics card in the year 2015 why stick a 6 year old HDMI 1.4a port on it that is only capable of displaying 4k at 30hz and about as much use as a chocolate ashtray?

Here is an idea, all new 4K TV's sold today are HDMI 2.0 compatible, crazy I know but hear me out! Why not stick a HDMI 2.0 port on the Fury X card? I keep saying it but that is pure incompetence right there :p
Click to expand...

Because quite Simple really! Its a PC gaming GPU aimed at PC gamers where 90% of gamers will be sitting at a desk using a Monitor!

Not everyone will be gaming on a 4k TV! The market is slim!

Do you even own or want to own a FuryX anyway? you spend quite a lot time around this thread? If it don't match what you want from a GPU why you even in here?
 
shankly1985 said:
Because quite Simple really! Its a PC gaming GPU aimed at PC gamers where 90% of gamers will be sitting at a desk using a Monitor!

Not everyone will be gaming on a 4k TV! The market is slim!

Do you even own or want to own a FuryX anyway? you spend quite a lot time around this thread? If it don't match what you want from a GPU why you even in here?
Click to expand...

You should really pay more attention, I had to send 2 back that I bought for my 2nd PC due to whinegate, now do you own a Fury X?

Guessing not but hey suppose I could be wrong right? :p
 
mururoa said:
Philips BDM4065UC is a regular consumer monitor, very popular on these forums too.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I'm on phone and Modified my post. But most monitors of that size tend to be for POS advertisement.

Does look like a spanking monitor, would get one if I had the money. Would rather have a decent monitor and use it as a tv with the sky box etc.

Don't need all the ******** or tuners they pack with modern tv's.
 
Mauller said:
Yeah, I'm on phone and Modified my post. But most monitors of that size tend to be for POS advertisement.

Does look like a spanking monitor, would get one if I had the money. Would rather have a decent monitor and use it as a tv with the sky box etc.

Don't need all the ******** or tuners they pack with modern tv's.
Click to expand...

Don't TVs have things for upscaling content if it's not native resolution (which would be a lot on a 4K screen) where as monitors don't which is why things look pretty dire if not run at native resolution?
Do they also have stuff to smooth stuff out (by blurring?) and things like that which would make watching TV on a monitor less pleasent? (I've considered using old monitors for a TV myself, but didn't bother)
 
GoogalyMoogaly said:
Don't TVs have things for upscaling content if it's not native resolution (which would be a lot on a 4K screen) where as monitors don't which is why things look pretty dire if not run at native resolution?
Do they also have stuff to smooth stuff out (by blurring?) and things like that which would make watching TV on a monitor less pleasent? (I've considered using old monitors for a TV myself, but didn't bother)
Click to expand...

The majority of monitors have built in scalars. Most smoothing stuff on tv's is frame interpolation. But depends if you like it or not. Have been watching most things interpolated to 144fps using Smooth Video Project recently. Is so nice.

And most blurring is in the media itself, but the faster gtg times on a monitor should have less ghosting than most tv's.

Especially since 144 is 6x 24 so you don't get the juddering or fast forward effect like when going 24 - 60.
 
GoogalyMoogaly said:
Don't TVs have things for upscaling content if it's not native resolution (which would be a lot on a 4K screen) where as monitors don't which is why things look pretty dire if not run at native resolution?
Do they also have stuff to smooth stuff out (by blurring?) and things like that which would make watching TV on a monitor less pleasent? (I've considered using old monitors for a TV myself, but didn't bother)
Click to expand...

TV's do have a lot of processing tech built in to try to give a better image yes, it also tends to add lag, which obviously you would never notice with movies/TV as its not interactive, you can also usually turn all of that off using a "game" mode that gets it back down to reasonable levels.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom