• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

Hilarious bug in drivers - every other few reboots you get memory clock slider enabled in catalyst control center.
When such reboot happens, OC the memory and never turn the system off ... let it sleep at night and make the uptime last for months.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1547314/official-amd-r9-radeon-fury-nano-x-x2-fiji-owners-club/1680#post_24104606


Heres an oc result from a reviewhttp://uk.hardware.info/reviews/6158/19/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review-amds-new-flag-ship-graphics-card-overclocking-results

amd-radeon-r9-fury-x.jpg


Now that i think of it:
It could be that HBM flopped AMD??
All the first news listed 640gb bandwith (625mhz)...and great performance....could it be that some memory chips doesn't run at the desired speed, and they need to reduce it, hence the "lock" on memory??
 
Last edited:
muziqaz said:
are you serious? Typical troll, feeling a desire to prove something. Thread is for owners to share their findings and non owners ask questions and find out more about fury x. This thread is NOT for dicks to come over and start stating stats of some other hardware which has no relation with thread at hand and then feel hurt that they are being call for thread derailment. No need to act stupid and try to bring 'justice' to the thread.
Click to expand...

There is nothing to prove or any justice to bring. Would just be nice to have an open discussion about a products pros and cons without having to wade though butthurt people whinging over everthing they dont agree with.
 
chroniclard said:
There is nothing to prove or any justice to bring. Would just be nice to have an open discussion about a products pros and cons without having to wade though butthurt people whinging over everthing they dont agree with.
Click to expand...

would be nice to have open discussion without butthurt people bringing in unrelated discussion to the thread. 500 sold 980tis have nothing to do with fury. get over it, no one cares.
 
Mtom said:
Hilarious bug in drivers - every other few reboots you get memory clock slider enabled in catalyst control center.
When such reboot happens, OC the memory and never turn the system off ... let it sleep at night and make the uptime last for months.

http://www.overclock.net/t/1547314/official-amd-r9-radeon-fury-nano-x-x2-fiji-owners-club/1680#post_24104606


Heres an oc result from a reviewhttp://uk.hardware.info/reviews/6158/19/amd-radeon-r9-fury-x-review-amds-new-flag-ship-graphics-card-overclocking-results

amd-radeon-r9-fury-x.jpg

Now that i think of it:
It could be that HBM flopped AMD??
All the first news listed 640gb bandwith (625mhz)...and great performance....could it be that some memory chips doesn't run at the desired speed, and they need to reduce it, hence the "lock" on memory??
Click to expand...


They managed to overclock the memory but didn't actually give any comparison between standard memory vs overclocked memory. Even then I guess a 100MHz on both core and HBM gives a decent increase in performance.

From the article :
"In the end we managed to get a 3DMark Fire Strike score of 16963 points on overclocked settings, a nice increase on the standard 14098 points we achieved. To put the above result in to perspective we managed an overclocked score in 3D Mark on our Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 Ti of 19359 points. "

Note: This is a Gigabyte 980Ti G1. http://uk.hardware.info/productinfo/308914/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-980-ti-g1-gaming-6gb/testresults

With voltage unlocking we may get closer to an overclocked 980ti especially with driver optimisations over the news few months.
 
Last edited:
fs123 said:
They managed to overclock the memory but didn't actually give any comparison between standard memory vs overclocked memory. Even then I guess a 100MHz on both core and HBM gives a decent increase in performance.

From the article :
"In the end we managed to get a 3DMark Fire Strike score of 16963 points on overclocked settings, a nice increase on the standard 14098 points we achieved. To put the above result in to perspective we managed an overclocked score in 3D Mark on our Gigabyte GeForce GTX 980 Ti of 19359 points. "

Note: This is a Gigabyte 980Ti G1. http://uk.hardware.info/productinfo/308914/gigabyte-geforce-gtx-980-ti-g1-gaming-6gb/testresults

With voltage unlocking we may get closer to an overclocked 980ti especially with driver optimisations over the news few months.
Click to expand...

You can check anyones result with standard memory. If i recall correctly thats about 2000 point plus in graphics score
 
Dicehunter said:
That graphics score is a little poo considering a nicely clocked 980 Ti can get 22k.

Really hope we get some proper OC tool, Unlocked voltage etc... :)
Click to expand...

Well with voltage unlock it could be in the same tier...

I'm really interested to see someone replicate these setting and run some comparison to precious benches...
 
Last edited:
I doubt anyone managed to run fury in win 10. no workable drivers yet.
In regards to the scores being disappointing, guys calm down, at least its a start. Matt has core clocked to 1125Mhz, wonder what he is getting in Firestrike.
As I said before someone here tested firestrike and I think were getting something around 17k graphics score. I'll be damned if I could find it here :D
 
Why are people with reg dates of 2002 begging AMD directly for voltage control?

Go ask Unwinder or Sapphire's Trixx engineer, you should know this. Never been through a launch before? :rolleyes:

Unwinder said MSI will be sending him a sample in a couple of weeks. If you want it faster cough up your own.
 
Final8y said:
AMD needs to make sure that pump issue is fixed ASP even though it seems to be in the minority AMD needs to make sure QC is tightened up on that part.
Click to expand...

I agree. It seems they really need to have a word with Cooler Master. It's not good for their PR.

I do wonder why thy didn't go with Asetek again though, like they did with 295X2. I never heard of similar issues there.

Also the owners thread needs more images. I really like the look of this GPU.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom