sculptor said:Im running 1 GPU and 1 GPU on mine.
Havent tried running 2 CPU clients as I think it would slow everything down so there would be no points benefit.
Thanks. I've now done an update to the quick guide and have finished the gpu folding guide. Feel free to make suggestions for improvements to it.BillytheImpaler said:Stanford mirror of the driver: http://folding.stanford.edu/release/6-5_xp-2k_dd_ccc_wdm_enu_32464.exe
ATi mirror of the driver: http://support.ati.com/ics/support/default.asp?deptID=894&task=knowledge&questionID=22264
Add what?BillytheImpaler said:Whenever you think it's ready, Joe, I'll add it to the blank post in the sticky reserved for the GPU-howto. Let me know.
I think i asked that before and it was a yes. They do seem to be getting quite a good ppd apparently.VeNT said:so,
if you've a dual core system, is it worth running the GPU client on current PPD?
even with the loss of one of the cores?
VeNT said:so,
if you've a dual core system, is it worth running the GPU client on current PPD?
even with the loss of one of the cores?
Stanford said they could easily reduce the polling so i would imagine you would have to have a very slow cpu before it has an impact.shadowscotland said:Any one running their x1900 on a lower spec rig? and if so is it getting the same 600ppd?
Joe42 said:Stanford said they could easily reduce the polling so i would imagine you would have to have a very slow cpu before it has an impact.
That suggests it may even be cpu limited...?shadowscotland said:From stan's logs in the other thread - he answered my question as the x1900 in his 4000+ was folding slower that the x1900 in his C2D's (yes that's 3 Gpu clients )