It depends how you read it now doesnt it.
its not the first thing youve made up in this thread now is it.
It was an innocent mistake but it must be a nightmare having the same name as someone like that.
It depends how you read it now doesnt it.
its not the first thing youve made up in this thread now is it.
youngster? at this point the Sun are out and out lying.. constantly saying child.The mum speaks.. what was Huw thinking..
Parents of youngster in Huw Edwards scandal consumed by fear & injustice
AS a newspaper reporter I’ve sat down with hundreds of families who have trusted me to tell their stories. But when I was politely ushered into the living room of a smart terraced home a fortnight …www.thesun.co.uk
Well isn't that asking us to infer from things that did happen, that a bunch of worse stuff might also have happened?
The evidence as presented is a whole bunch of nothing, really.
In as much as we're all expected to walk on eggshells, these days. For the sake of a few. Those who tend towards moral panic and faux outrage, over every little thing.Nope, the alleged DM's to the 17-year-old schoolboy were also posted earlier. Why would you assign greater weight to the ones posted above?
Again it was there for context, he allegedly seems to like flirting with people on social media.
To be clear, flirting with people on social media isn't in itself bad and wasn't presented as such but... if it involves minors (a 17 year old) or junior employees in the organisation you work for and you're a senior employee then it would be rather reckless. Do you agree?
in which case rather than letting us see these vague ones (in need of a quick "dial it back a bit from HR perhaps) and you making the argument that there are worse ones we haven't seen.No, and it wasn't presented as such, try to read again, it's just examples of him sending flirty DMs.
No one said those two were cause for concern. Would it be cause for concern at your work if a senior person was allegedly flirting unsolicited with a junior employee and caused them to feel uncomfortable? Or was allegedly flirting with a 17-year-old?
In as much as we're all expected to walk on eggshells, these days. For the sake of a few. Those who tend towards moral panic and faux outrage, over every little thing.
[...]
Some of it is 100% petty and completely pathetic.
e: I think office environments tend to attract more than their fair share of drama queens. Put it that way.
in which case rather than letting us see these vague ones (in need of a quick "dial it back a bit from HR perhaps) and you making the argument that there are worse ones we haven't seen.
Show me the content of the DMs and we'll discuss it. Along with the exact age of the recipients at the time.A 61-year-old man allegedly DMing a 17 year old is just moral panic? Ditto to allegedly flirty, unsolicited DMs to a junior employee he'd not even met?
You're seemingly ignoring context, ignoring the accusations and have given a vague reply related to some personal views/issues you have with office politics in general?
What argument are you talking about? The alleged exchange with the 17 year old was already posted, the BBC employee hasn't posted their alleged exchange.
You appear to be attributing an argument to me that hasn't been made, just quote the argument in future and ask directly as it will save any confusion.
Other people have come forwards about DM sliding (we've already had the allegations from the 17 year old schoolboy and the junior BBC employee)... note these people are not claiming to be under age, one of them is apparently 35 and joked on social media that Huw tried to groom him until he found out.
Nothing wrong legally per se with flirting on social media, could come accorss creepy when unsolicited and legally-dodgy if pursued when you're not necessarily aware of the age of the person (as in the case of the 17-year-old allegation) or HR-dodgy if you do it to people you work with:
This alleged incident seems super tame:
This alleged incident is obviously flirty:
That sort of thing would appear to be quite reckless and *if* that was a regular thing he did then it's unsurprising to have seen 3 more people come forwards after the initial story + then the BBC employees and then these appear on social media too.
Show me the content of the DMs and we'll discuss it. Along with the exact age of the recipients at the time.
Given the police have already said there's nothing doing here, I doubt they can be as bad as you think.
Don't forget his skin colour, it's clearly because he's white.omg what a dirty old man, how can he message such filth
So... "love hearts and kisses" in text-based conversations.The police didn't investigate it, you now confusing it with the first allegation re: a completely different person. You guys are commenting on stories you don't seem to have even familiarised yourself with the basics of. Do you think it's normal to seemingly/allegedly have a habit of doing this to the point where you (quite possibly unknowingly) end up flirting with a minor?
BBC 'sex pics' star had Insta chat with teen, 17 using love hearts & kisses
THE BBC presenter suspended over sex pic claims started a chat with a teen follower from his Instagram account — using love hearts and kisses in his messages. The individual said they were contacte…www.thesun.co.uk
So... "love hearts and kisses" in text-based conversations.
Wow, this is outrageous, isn't it. I'm not sure how I'll sleep tonight with this weighing on my mind.
He's as bad as Prince Andrew!So... "love hearts and kisses" in text-based conversations.
Wow, this is outrageous, isn't it. I'm not sure how I'll sleep tonight with this weighing on my mind.
Clearly iffy enough - to some people - to lose your job at the BBC, yes.Yeah, you're just being disingenuous now... no one said sending love hearts was outrageous, it's the alleged flirting with a 17-year-old that is iffy.
OMG 60 year old man has social media presence Oh the humanity!Other people have come forwards about DM sliding (we've already had the allegations from the 17 year old schoolboy and the junior BBC employee)... note these people are not claiming to be under age, one of them is apparently 35 and joked on social media that Huw tried to groom him until he found out.
Nothing wrong legally per se with flirting on social media, could come accorss creepy when unsolicited and legally-dodgy if pursued when you're not necessarily aware of the age of the person (as in the case of the 17-year-old allegation) or HR-dodgy if you do it to people you work with:
This alleged incident seems super tame:
This alleged incident is obviously flirty:
That sort of thing would appear to be quite reckless and *if* that was a regular thing he did then it's unsurprising to have seen 3 more people come forwards after the initial story + then the BBC employees and then these appear on social media too.
So... "love hearts and kisses" in text-based conversations.
Wow, this is outrageous, isn't it. I'm not sure how I'll sleep tonight with this weighing on my mind.