Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
And a whole 1 point gain in Port Royal.
Port Royal is DirectX12, not 9, so what are you trying to even say
So how do arc cards compare to nvidia now intel have had a while to improve drivers?Sick of videos comparing arc to previous arc. What matters is how it now compares vs the competition.
Still haven't seen anyone test that yet. GamersNexus mentioned they would, just hasn't happened yet.So how do arc cards compare to nvidia now intel have had a while to improve drivers?
Article said:The latter is only of secondary importance in this article, because as we have heard from well-informed circles, Intel is currently preparing a major driver update that is intended to increase performance across the board - apparently one of the undoubtedly existing brakes has been identified and eliminated.
Me said:Currently a 12700K @ 5.3/5.2/4.0 (efficiency) so it should be making a difference in CPU bound areas.
Per the other thread I think there is definitely a driver overhead issue coming into play. Its relative performance in more CPU heavy scenarios such as the Hitman 3 Dartmoor benchmark or the Destiny 2 tower (notorious on older Ryzen systems for being bad) is a noticeable step-down vs when it can stretch its legs.
Going from 48% behind to 17% behind vs a 3060Ti in Hitman 3 does point to this. I am not really CPU bound on the 3060Ti (@1440p) so the ARC card shouldn't suffer such a performance hit in the same benchmark on the same CPU when it is relatively strong in the other benchmark.