Deleted User 298457
Deleted User 298457
LOLYou won't be able to comprehend this but the rest of the world isn't as exploitative as you've shown yourself to be
Hakuna Matata my man.
LOLYou won't be able to comprehend this but the rest of the world isn't as exploitative as you've shown yourself to be
Lol. Your "My assumption everyone else is vile justifies me being vile" worldview is the diametric opposite to "Hakuna Matata".LOL
Hakuna Matata my man.
Landlording is a business that needs strict regulation because it's people's homes and livelihoods at stake. Hobbyist landlords wade in to these landlord discussions like folk with Ferrari keyrings thinking they're at the top table with the F40 owners.You just insisted everyone was supposed to exploit whatever situation they find themselves in, seemingly without realising how revealing that was about your approach to life.
You won't be able to comprehend this but the rest of the world isn't as exploitative as you've shown yourself to be
The only way to level the playing field is to remove the need for altruistic (lol) hobbyist landlords and their good will. How? Just regulate it so all landlording is to the same playbook.Nonsense
Edit: On second thought, I'm waiting for my sale to go through and I'm not a tenant so I actually have no vested interest in this anymore.
So maybe I am getting in the way. In that case I'm taking my money (minus capital gains rip off tax) and running. Laters![]()
![]()
Better than my goal in life to be to 'make money from an asset but not too much'Is it your life goal to infect every thread on the forum with your utter nonsense?
You seem to have the keyboard equivalent of verbal diarrhoea.
You've replied to the same post twice instead of responding to my last post.Landlording is a business that needs strict regulation because it's people's homes and livelihoods at stake. Hobbyist landlords wade in to these landlord discussions like folk with Ferrari keyrings thinking they're at the top table with the F40 owners.
Either stay on the side lines and earn your pittiful 6%, go big and do it properly, or be quiet. You lot are the frontline infantry of the big corps; it's about time you realised it.
You're just attacking me now because you realise you've done capitalism wrong. Enjoy your keyring/funsize/sample of being a big dog.You've replied to the same post twice instwad of responding to my last post.
Was that ineptitude or because you wanted an excuse for not reading the article I suggested would help your current misunderstanding?
You seem to be struggling to grasp the point being made, and intent on deflecting instead.
The article actually explains why you're doing that.
You've managed to confuse yourself so thoroughly - presumably there'll be a connection with the same flaw that led to you telling us you think you try and exploit every situation you find yourself in.You're just attacking me now because you realise you've done capitalism wrong. Enjoy your keyring/funsize/sample of being a big dog.
I'm not angry, just lolling at you guys thinking you have a voice because you make 3% instead of 5% on a house you inherited.You've managed to confuse yourself so thoroughly - presumably there'll be a connection with the same flaw that led to you telling us you think you try and exploit every situation you find yourself in.
Are you most angry with the landlords charging the most they can or the landlords charging less?
As I say, the article will help you understand your misunderstanding, but while we wait for you to read it...I'm not angry, just lolling at you guys thinking you have a voice because you make 3% instead of 5% on a house you inherited.
Are there actually that many people who inherit houses?I'm not angry, just lolling at you guys thinking you have a voice because you make 3% instead of 5% on a house you inherited.
I'm lolling at hobbyist landlords claiming altruism in a thread about a real issue that exists.As I say, the article will help you understand your misunderstanding, but while we wait for you to read it...
Which landlords are youangrylolling at more? The landlords charging 3% or 5%.
(hint: the fact you're having to dodge the question to protect your worldview is evidencing just how rickety that worldview is)
I'm lolling at hobbyist landlords claiming altruism in a thread about a real issue that exists.
Either stay on the side lines and earn your pittiful 6%, go big and do it properly, or be quiet.
More of a jibe at 1 property hobbyist landlords piping up in this thread like they're in the club.Go calculate the cost of being between tenants. Not only the lost rent but the costs of evicting the existing tenant, the costs associated with reletting, and so on. It's often more cost-effective to keep the tenant.
I don't think removing hobby landlords is the answer, but yes more regulation and centralised body's that can take action against landlords that don't follow said regulations.The only way to level the playing field is to remove the need for altruistic (lol) hobbyist landlords and their good will. How? Just regulate it so all landlording is to the same playbook.
To be clear I didn't mean remove the hobbyist landlords - I said to remove the need for the only "decent" landlords to be ones applying goodwill out of the kindness of their hearts. Everyone should be held to the same good quality standard.I don't think removing hobby landlords is the answer, but yes more regulation and centralised body's that can take action against landlords that don't follow said regulations.