I wonder if he did that to get clicks though. At worst I think this game would be a 8/10 to certain individuals and that would be because you know graphics not witcher/horizon quality and because it does not run with 144fps minimums and no g-sync... lol
I agree out of 100 is better and makes more sense. But as it is not used by many it makes sense to score 10/10. Just need to not overthink. There never be a perfect game with no room for improvement, so pointless to even think that imo.I can understand the not giving a 10/10. Thats applicable to me too, not just for games, but for anything. Not matter how good I feel a movie is, or a book, or a computer game, I wouldnt give it a 10/10. Purely because that is a maximum score, it leaves no room for improvement. Having said that, I've never really been a fan of scores out of 10, I find it much too restricting. Out of 100 makes more sense to me...for example, those people who feel that a 10/10 is a perfect score, may well say well I wouldnt give it a 10/10 but I would give it a 99/100 and in some way that actually seems to work in my logic. 9/10 doesnt seem to do an almost perfect title justice, 10/10 suggests perfection, 99/100 shows good justice for an almost perfect title without actually being perfect and thus leaving room for improvement. Might not make sense to many people but makes sense to me
Agreed.
Maybe I am...So harsh on the PC
They seem mostly smooth and stutter free due to largely being locked at 30 fps in demanding games and due to the gamepad. Due to 30fps being half the refresh rate of most displays, the frame stays on screen for two refreshes. A PC game won't seem as smooth on a none gsync/freesync display at something like 45-60fps at 60hz, as 60 doesn't divide by 45-59 equally and it's this variance in the frames that gives you the less smooth feeling - some frames are staying on longer than others. Ignore this problem, and it's smoother on the PC. This issue is just as much of a problem in some ways as low frame rate itself. It's for this reason that console games will either run at 60fps or 30fps and sometimes use clever techniques to go up in fps with a poorer image to reach 60, or down in fps for 30 fixed with a better image as 60 isn't workable. Most of the time (virtually always) if your pc is capable of 40-55fps and you lock to 30fps, it will always seem smoother than a console game at 30fps providing you use a gamepad. It will never seem as smooth using a mouse. Motion blur simply masks console games dipping below 30/60 fps.
Gsync/Freesync eliminates the above problem but doesn't remedy the feeling of low frame rate like some think it does. 50fps still feels like 50fps with movement, it's just it is smoothed out without tear. The problem with a decent graphics card and one of these monitors at 120hz+ with 60fps-120fps is that anything less feels like a juddery mess, slideshow or both. My setup (and it's far from top end) has made horizon zero dawn on a standard ps4 feel unplayable.
As for Zelda, very tempted. Actually had a switch on order but bottled it today and cancelled. I'll probably wait to see how mass effect is first.
) but yes, when using a mouse, it feels noticeably worse.
Yeah but does it run 4K 60fps? Nope, must be crap then! Sorry could not help it
It's a good game and I try not to be too negative, but the frothing-at-the-mouth 10/10 reviews turned me from not caring less to avid anticipation overnight. Feel pretty let down and while I appreciate it for what it is, I cannot see why everyone gushes over it as much as they do.I agree the story is nothing special, but loving the rest of it myself
LOL , how dare you ! You'll have the SJWs out after you now for not proclaiming it to be the second coming !
I actually really like the graphics. The fps is not really an issue for me either. As for the game it has me hooked.
