Soldato
- Joined
- 16 May 2004
- Posts
- 6,901
- Location
- Derby
What is Onana wrong about exactly?He'll get a ban for it.
Kinda echo this really. Also to add Garnacho should know better.
What is Onana wrong about exactly?He'll get a ban for it.
Kinda echo this really. Also to add Garnacho should know better.
That it shouldn't go further. That doesn't automatically mean a ban before people pile on.What is Onana wrong about exactly?
So how far should it go?That it shouldn't go further. That doesn't automatically mean a ban before people pile on.
So how far should it go?
Oh jaysus, we’re getting the big fella involved!?All the way to the top!
Well a ban would do United a favor so perhaps some education?So how far should it go?
so do you think he should get a ban for the tweet?Well a ban would do United a favor so perhaps some education?
Edit.
I do think he might get a ban though
That thread title hurts so much![]()
saw this on the bbc website......thought it quite apt.Martial with 89 goals in 9 seasons at United and he's still there.... Shambolic
Anon: Martial has survived Louis Van Gaal, Giggs, Mourinho, Ole, Michael Carrick, Ralf Ragnick and now will probably survive Ten Hag. And he is playing up top for us as a number nine. Tells you everything about football operations at the club.
no, you don't see. no one is blaming an individual but simply using him as example of what is wrong at the club.Ah we're back to blaming Martial I see.
So you'd rather we pay him to leave and bring in someone like Weghorst as backup? Would that improve us? **** me of all the complaints to make about the club our backup striker is not one of them.no, you don't see. no one is blaming an individual but simply using him as example of what is wrong at the club.
So you'd rather we pay him to leave and bring in someone like Weghorst as backup? Would that improve us? **** me of all the complaints to make about the club our backup striker is not one of them.
So you'd rather we pay him to leave and bring in someone like Weghorst as backup? Would that improve us? **** me of all the complaints to make about the club our backup striker is not one of them.
I supported Martial for ages, always thought he'd come good but he's not good enough, and I blame us for that as I think he genuinely could have been a hell of a player. But like most young players that come to United or come through the ranks in the last 10 years, we just ruin them and stifle any kind of development
Your missing the point - It's the recruitment over the last number of years is shambolic....Martial is symbolic of that. He as a person is not the issue.
We shouldn't have a striker who's only scored 89 goals in 9 years at the club and still be relying on him as our "main" backup.....
United have been crying out for a world class/top class striker for years now, 5 years plus at least - Where is that individual?? Other clubs seem to find and nurture talent, good quality strikers brought in.... United just do nothing.....
All the "blame" getting thrown at Hojlund already for not scoring in premiership etc is just ridiculous - 7 games in, he's 20 years old, playing a terrible team at the moment - give the guy a chance.
You quite clearly don’t see the issue being discussed.So you wanted us to pay Martial off and bring in a world class striker (I assume Kane) and then go into the season with one striker and no other signings?
You quite clearly don’t see the issue being discussed.