Caporegime
- Joined
- 30 Jul 2013
- Posts
- 29,440
Not really low balling, because of the subsidy.
Neil79 is that you
Every movie made in the UK gets a subsidy, anyway as pointed out above the final figure (without the marketing budget taken into account) is likely to increase by close to 100 million. This thing is looking like its going to be the most expensive movie ever made..Not really low balling, because of the subsidy.
I just read the Film Tax Relief page on the British Film Commission. It states 25% tax relief on UK qualifying spend. Reading the case studies it implies only the UK spend. So a £44million rebate implies £176m of UK qualifying spend. I'd love to get some feedback from someone that understands this stuff as to if it is as clear cut as that.The UK government gave Marvel Studios a $55 million subsidy?!
Mental.
With the rebate taken in to account, it's not currently in the top 40, but OK.Every movie made in the UK gets a subsidy, anyway as pointed out above the final figure (without the marketing budget taken into account) is likely to increase by close to 100 million. This thing is looking like its going to be the most expensive movie ever made..
It's currently 'cost' 275 million, that puts it at no 16, quite a few of the films above it were also made in the UK...With the rebate taken in to account, it's not currently in the top 40, but OK.
List of most expensive films - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Chick flicks are for the woke?chick flick .. for the woke .. and impressionable young ones ..
It only matters to the usuals trying to spread their agenda. Nobody else gives a **** apart from shareholders.Why does the productions costs matter to me or the vast majority of casual viewers?
WrongAll final budgets have rebates taken in to account...maybe do some research.
Zimbabwean?I predict 600 million dollars.
Now that's a fun game.I predict 600 million dollars. Or maybe a slight loss.