It's a Positive step, and well done for making itGot an appointment booked for next month over the phone which I'm really nervous over. But then after that I'll be assigned a key worker to help with my mental health
It's a Positive step, and well done for making it
Interesting. I'm on the NHS waiting list for this. I'm guessing it'll take years to happen, though.Thought this was worth posting here, if anybody had gotten an ADHD diagnosis privately:
I don't have ADHD, but three private clinics say I do
A BBC journalist was told "You do not have ADHD" by an NHS doctor - but private clinics said otherwise.www.bbc.co.uk
45 minutes with a disinterested person on a video call is enough for them to give you prescription meds though. Seems wrong.
It's the same with a whole host of mental health disorders in that there are no concrete tests to diagnose them so results are going to vary.
It's no surprise that the NHS are going to be more conservative about diagnosing these conditions over a private clinic.
IIRC the outcomes are similar for things like autism as well. A friend got a diagnosis privately for high-functioning autism but the NHS weren't having it despite him being assessed multiple times over a long-period.
45 minutes with a disinterested person on a video call is enough for them to give you prescription meds though. Seems wrong.
Many GPs will give you a prescription for an SSRI after filling out a 2 minute questionaire if you score the right way for depression or anxiety.
Starting an SSRI rather than titrating? No, no GP should be doing this, I've never seen or heard this done, it goes against NICE guidelines, and I suggest if you or any loved one experiences this you should make a complaint.
That's not a problem.What exactly is your definition of titrating because I and many others I know have first hand experience of seeing a GP for the first time and walking out with a prescription for an SSRI.
That's not a problem.
Meds should always be started after a consultation rather than a questionnaire
PHQ-9 for example - 2 min questionnaire but SSRI should never be started purely on this and instead needs a holistic assessment that could include this.
I was recently diagnosed privately. I'm convinced my diagnosis is correct. This programme will do more harm than any good because getting a diagnosis and medication is difficult as it is and there's a massive stigma around the condition. This will just make things worse.They are for-profit, private clinics. Of course they have a much lower threshold for diagnosis. Their business model relies on positive feedback. You get that by giving the patient what they want.
I am very much against private diagnoses of ADHD. I also very much appreciate why genuine ADHD patients use their services and benefit from them. But I also believe the majority of new diagnoses do not have ADHD, and as such are started on frankly dangerous medication and have a lifelong label that often shapes their sick role.
There is no benefit to the NHS of refusing diagnosis, other than someone doesn't have a diagnosis. Yes, there will always be the very very few that slip through the net, but if someone has been assessed multiple times over a long period, I presume by multiple NHS clinicians, then it's a fairly safe bet to say they don't have autism, whether or not they or you wish to believe it.
DOI: Worked in mental health, used to assess & treat ADHD patients, including those that sourced a private diagnosis.
Exactly this, addictive and dangerous medication when taken over years. It's shocking.
Like the current interview on Panorama, the one in his kitchen.
Clear scam. It belittles the struggles genuine ADHD patients go through. A simple money making scheme that can leave a patient with a possible incorrect diagnosis, with dangerous meds.