Soldato
Damm is the battery life that bad on the mirrless Canon?Yes the eye tracking AF and 40fps electronic shutter is immense - But that alone isn't enough to sway me when just the fundamental things like battery life and price are not where I feel they should be. £1500 for a brand new 5D4 vs £2879 for an R5 is a massive difference for what would be some notable advancements, but not enough to warrant £1379 extra cash really, and then you have to buy more batteries at £120 each because you're only gonna get half the battery life!
For the rest of the AF though, I've got so used to the AF system on the 5D series that it's second nature now, DOF preview button is remapped to be instant hold AI servo, so tracking is no problem although it's not as precise as R series which uses 100% of the sensor as AF points lol.
If I bought right now into mirrorless, only the R3 fits all of my needs, and that is £4294 lowest brand new price
I'll save up over this year extra cash from shoots and get one I reckon if there's no new news about the R5 mark 2.
I know that the battery life on my Sony are better than my old 5d4.
Price wise it's not a fair comparison really. Ones a old dlsr and the other a mirrorless.
Of course the old dlsr will be way more cheaper than a mirrorless!
What did you gain from upgrading from the mk 3 to the mark 4?when I did that, I did not see much of a difference imo. The mk3 was already a great camera
Last edited: