I'm holding off on updating before they get it fixed.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
**THE NVIDIA DRIVERS THREAD**
- Thread starter Boomstick777
- Start date
I'm holding off on updating before they get it fixed.
Associate
Something I just noticed though!!
I have SLI enabled
G-Sync enabled
and look!!!
I have SLI enabled
G-Sync enabled
and look!!!
Caporegime
DSR and G-sync working bud?
Associate
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 5,502
It could be the reason behind the driver issue? Good to see dsr and sli together. Sort of like chocolate and peanut butter
Soldato
Hmm going to hold off on this one then until a hotfix gets released.
Associate
Not overly impressed so far though.
1440 (Native)
4K
Looks the same to me if not a bit more aliased on the 4k
1440 (Native)
4K
Looks the same to me if not a bit more aliased on the 4k
Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 5,502
Not overly impressed so far though.
1440 (Native)
4K
Looks the same to me if not a bit more aliased on the 4k
It could be in beta forum. Think I'm going to hold off installing these as well.
Associate
I disagree man, when it was moving particularly (I think anyway) there was more pixel creep/temporal nonsense
You can't screenshot DSR you just get the high res buffer before it is run through the DSR filter to produce an image at your native res.
If you are getting temporal artefacts it probably isn't working properly as they should be reduced.
Permabanned
Take guru3d users with a bucket of salt
Associate
I tried the DSR with SLI ( 980ti's ) with Tomb Raider 2013, looks very good @ 2x ( 3440x1440 original ), visible differences in screenshots and looks amazing in motion.
Associate
How do we feel about smoothness? I stuck it on 0
No problems here on my 980M, running flawlessly.
Soldato
The Nvidia forums thread on these drivers make it sound like this driver release is a complete dogs dinner.
I usually jump on the latest drivers immediately. Might wait a bit on these.
You guys seeing the same issues?
This was posted by an Nvidia rep 20 mins ago:
"Status update: No resolution yet. We are treating this as a top priority. We have finally managed to repro the issue internally and engineers are debugging the repro system as I type. The large majority of systems don't have this issue, but we are definitely aware of it's seriousness and are trying to isolate it as quickly as we can."
Do we know what they are referring too?
I usually jump on the latest drivers immediately. Might wait a bit on these.
You guys seeing the same issues?
This was posted by an Nvidia rep 20 mins ago:
"Status update: No resolution yet. We are treating this as a top priority. We have finally managed to repro the issue internally and engineers are debugging the repro system as I type. The large majority of systems don't have this issue, but we are definitely aware of it's seriousness and are trying to isolate it as quickly as we can."
Do we know what they are referring too?
Man of Honour
AOTS with a pair of TXs and these new drivers (364.47).
Performance is exactly the same as 362.00
The only difference is the newer drivers are a bit more unstable when the cards are pushed.
Some things I have noticed about AOTS benchmark in DX12.
There is a big benefit using an 8 core 5960X over even a 5930k when using 2 cards.
System RAM needs to be setup properly to run DX12 without crashing, DX11 is not so fussy.
Last edited: