• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

**The OcUK Benchmarks thread!**

:p

Getting there, the BF3 results are all over the place, some are sword breaker, some aren't some are 12.11, some aren't, some are maxed out, some aren't.

I need to clean things up a little and remove irrelevant results, 12.11 pretty much turned this thread upside down as we had a heap of results from 12.9. Getting there though, I'll update a little later with a sample of what every result group will look like.
 
Yep I'll clean it up tomorrow as I've just found out that MS Office on OSX is a complete pile of ****

Ranges do not match up at all with the readings, a 120 reading, reads off as 230, 384 reads off as 800. Not a clue why, but I have a hunch its down to this POS called an operating system.

Edit: nvm, turns out if you want stacked charts in OSX it does just that :o
 
Last edited:
Yep I'll clean it up tomorrow as I've just found out that MS Office on OSX is a complete pile of ****

Ranges do not match up at all with the readings, a 120 reading, reads off as 230, 384 reads off as 800. Not a clue why, but I have a hunch its down to this POS called an operating system.

Edit: nvm, turns out if you want stacked charts in OSX it does just that :o


Haven t used OSX for a long time, can't help you with that :(
 

Afaik its essentially a UD5 with better onboard Audio/LAN ports. The X79 UD boards aren't THAT bad, just when pushing an extreme OC the droop becomes an issue, 4.75ghz was easy, 5ghz was a pain due to adjusting power limits correctly to compensate for the droop etc...My UD7 will be a good board for someone who wants a middle of the road OC (4.4-4.6ghz) and the ability to have 4 GPU's.

Haven t used OSX for a long time, can't help you with that :(

Its ok got it sorted (I think) sample file of what every result grouping will look like, organised by resolution

It doesn't help I'm running on a 2.6ghz core2duo, 1066mhz DDR3 with onboard 320M, I presume the OS would be a great deal smoother on some better hardware. Certainly not as easy to multi-task on as Windows 7 by a long shot. I absolutely love the 'snap to fit' feature on Win 7, makes life 10000x easier when reading data from one source and inputting into another :)
 
I'm going to add some benchmarks for the following games at 1440p.

Hitman
Farcry 3
Sleeping Dogs
Battlefield 3


For sleeping dogs and Hitman i will use the built in benchmarks for consistency.

For battlefield 3 i will either play sword breaker or use the jet flying mission for consistency.

Not sure what to do for farcry 3? Suggestions? I was thinking about playing the first level up until you get your first Tatu.
 
I was going to revive this at the weekend :p

Have merged most of the data though I'm still missing quite a few results for certain cards (mostly 600 series at 1080).

As for far cry I'm not sure as I haven't played much yet, time demo in a certain area would be my idea, though I have to get the damn thing working smoothly first.
 
I was going to revive this at the weekend :p

Have merged most of the data though I'm still missing quite a few results for certain cards (mostly 600 series at 1080).

As for far cry I'm not sure as I haven't played much yet, time demo in a certain area would be my idea, though I have to get the damn thing working smoothly first.

I think ill just do the opening scene, up until you escape. That seemed fairly intensive at least according to the fps and heat created. :D

Btw whoever said Sleeping Dogs AA on High rather than Extreme didn't use Compute heavy AA was lying. It definitely does, its just not as extreme as well, extreme. :p
 
b72.png


zRcXT.jpg

Details of settings used.

Battlefield 3




FarCry 3




Hitman




Sleeping Dogs


 
Ok, so i sold my GTX680 and replaced it with an MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr. This is the bog standard non TI version. My system specs are exactly the same as they were with the 680 apart from the addition of a Vertex2e SSD for the games. Benchies as followes :






Really pleased with the performance of this card :)
 
Ok, so i sold my GTX680 and replaced it with an MSI GTX660 Twin Frozr. This is the bog standard non TI version. My system specs are exactly the same as they were with the 680 apart from the addition of a Vertex2e SSD for the games. Benchies as followes :



Really pleased with the performance of this card :)

Black Ops 2, Which level and part did you bench? FPS vary hugely on maps, i'm averaging 100 to 150 FPS depending on the map....
 
Back
Top Bottom