Man of Honour
- Joined
- 5 Jun 2003
- Posts
- 91,561
- Location
- Falling...
As SPW said, ultimately the weight is covered by the Wilks calculation.
My weight at the time of my PBs was 98kg (possibly more but that was as close as it was for those 3 lifts).
Now, my 1RMs are a little lower but so is my weight, but my Wilks score will be similar (in fact I checked them and they pretty much are similar).
The weight is important as it's at the time those PBs were recorded. I should redo my PBs and add a second weight entry - but at least that gives me a target to aim for.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
I'm not going to pretend I can shift 600kg at 91kg. Because... I can't - yet.
My weight at the time of my PBs was 98kg (possibly more but that was as close as it was for those 3 lifts).
Now, my 1RMs are a little lower but so is my weight, but my Wilks score will be similar (in fact I checked them and they pretty much are similar).
The weight is important as it's at the time those PBs were recorded. I should redo my PBs and add a second weight entry - but at least that gives me a target to aim for.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc608/fc608ab6e6dc2469165c10f9a8cb020731d10c69" alt="Smile :) :)"
I'm not going to pretend I can shift 600kg at 91kg. Because... I can't - yet.