Caporegime
If just using the new imac for Apple photos editing,am I correct in thinking the base machine with 8gig ram is enough, and using an external SSD for photos Library which is sitting at around 300gig at the moment? thanks
They look great, but I'd rather have an M1 Air with a separate monitor for the flexibility.
thats what stopped me buying the Mini M1 when it was released,i dont know what monitor would compare but it was just the stress of looking and trying to find one that was a near as it could be,so i decided wait for the new imac. Did Apple used to or still do sell seperate monitor that is similar?The problem is there aren't any monitors you can buy that are comparable to this.
thankyou.I have made my mind up to get an SSD. what is the reason the mechanical drives are smaller,I thought they would be bigger because of the mechanics or is it that the SSD has to have a bigger enclosure?@ChrisBuzz - going off your question about photo editing, I'd suggest pretty much any external that fits the budget will be sufficient. Mechanical mobile drives will be slower than their desktop counterparts but are much smaller. Of course, if you were after backing the data up, the cheapest option could be using two drives or investing in one that can do this for you (MyBook Duo).
I could certainly see myself tempted away from my current setup to one of these, especially if the need to hot desk and work on the fly comes to an end.
thats what stopped me buying the Mini M1 when it was released,i dont know what monitor would compare but it was just the stress of looking and trying to find one that was a near as it could be,so i decided wait for the new imac. Did Apple used to or still do sell seperate monitor that is similar?
I'm pleased with the screen on the new iMac, I was worried that at 24" they would go with 4K which isn't up to the usual Apple levels. The 24" LG UltraFine 4K has always been a little lacking and effectively only displays 1920x1080 when using retina pixel doubling.
Here's how the new screen measures up in terms of PPI and effective resolution when using pixel doubling.
21.5 Retina iMac
Native: 4096 x 2304
Retina: 2,048 x 1152
PPI: 218.58 pixels per in
24" M1 iMac
Native: 4480 x 2520
Retina: 2,240 x 1,260
PPI: 218.73 pixels per in
24" LG UltraFine
Native: 3840 x 2160
Retina: 1920 x 1,080
PPI: 185.9 pixels per in
27" 5K iMac
Native: 5120 x 2880
Retina: 2560 x 1440
PPI: 217.57 pixels per in
2,240 x 1,260 on the 24" (23.5) will be a very nice amount of space, very usable. It will look extra crispy with the proper amount of PPI.
that looks perfect for me. thanksHere is a post I made on the screen in the other thread.
thankyou.I have made my mind up to get an SSD. what is the reason the mechanical drives are smaller,I thought they would be bigger because of the mechanics or is it that the SSD has to have a bigger enclosure?
yes that sounds more like I wantIt's more a thing of portable mechanical drives using the 2.5" disks rather than the 3.5" disks like in desktop storage. Makes them smaller, lighter and ultimately more portable. SSD's are of course much quicker and can be smaller again. I have a My Passport SSD which is half the size again and very fast.