mmmm mmmm and then another mmmmm.My XFX xxxExtreme OC 640MB GTS Edition is definetly faster than the smaller 512MB GT.....Sweet as
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
** The Official 8800GT 512/256mb Review/Overclocking Thread **
- Thread starter clocka
- Start date
My XFX xxxExtreme OC 640MB GTS Edition is definetly faster than the smaller 512MB GT.....
What strain is it this time? Chronic?.
Soldato
- Joined
- 27 Jan 2003
- Posts
- 5,962
- Location
- Chesterfield, UK
Agreed.
It's not just a river in Egypt though.My XFX xxxExtreme OC 640MB GTS Edition is definetly faster than the smaller 512MB GT.....
Sell it and buy a GT, that's what I am doing and making some money back from my GTX in the process.I'm pretty gutted looking at how these GT's are performing when i just bought a GTX 2 month ago.
It's not just a river in Egypt though.
Sell it and buy a GT, that's what I am doing and making some money back from my GTX in the process.
Agreed
My XFX xxxExtreme OC 640MB GTS Edition is definetly faster than the smaller 512MB GT.....
No its not if you put it against an overclocked GT, unless you got a 112SP one its not faster.
In what games?
Try Crysis at 1280x1024 all high and post screenie of it in Crysis bench thread.
Well i'm enough of a forum noob as it is to be posting pictures!
I've just been doing more testing now.
Someone with an 8800gt on a c2d @ 3.6ghz got....
@ 1920x1200
Min 23
Average 28
Max 32
At this i am getting on my 8800gts 640mb c2d@ 3ghz...
@1920x1200
Min 12
Average 20.4
Max 23
===================================================================
So clearly..the GT is better which i'm pleased about as mine is already ordered!
(both takes pressumably done on EVERYTHING high @ 1920 x 1200)
EDIT
Just done tests @ 1680 + everything high (apart from proc on medium) just like yours (willhub) which from looking at your screenie you got basically....
Min 17.62
Average 33.35
Max 38.5 ish i guess overall
My c2d @ 3.0ghz + 640mb GTS @ 614/874 identical settings...
Min 14.39
Average 30.50
Max 38
So yea the GT seems better for sure, and nice to pocket £40 or so ontop too
=======================================================================
On 1280 + max everything as you described i'm getting
Min 27.46
Average 50.5 ish
Max 67-70ish
I've just been doing more testing now.
Someone with an 8800gt on a c2d @ 3.6ghz got....
@ 1920x1200
Min 23
Average 28
Max 32
At this i am getting on my 8800gts 640mb c2d@ 3ghz...
@1920x1200
Min 12
Average 20.4
Max 23
===================================================================
So clearly..the GT is better
which i'm pleased about as mine is already ordered!(both takes pressumably done on EVERYTHING high @ 1920 x 1200)
EDIT
Just done tests @ 1680 + everything high (apart from proc on medium) just like yours (willhub) which from looking at your screenie you got basically....
Min 17.62
Average 33.35
Max 38.5 ish i guess overall
My c2d @ 3.0ghz + 640mb GTS @ 614/874 identical settings...
Min 14.39
Average 30.50
Max 38
So yea the GT seems better for sure, and nice to pocket £40 or so ontop too
=======================================================================
On 1280 + max everything as you described i'm getting
Min 27.46
Average 50.5 ish
Max 67-70ish
Last edited:
WTF! Is that a GT or your GTS?
Yer BFG GT,
Don't know if i should push for more on the core ?
Was wanting to find the upper limit on that before tweaking the Memory and
Shaders a bit more.
Just that i am getting a bit scared now lol
Need to update my sig
What cooling ?
And have you tested for artifacts?
What temps under load?
Hi,
Still trying to get this card to fail during 3Dmark06
Currently at 770 / 2000 / 1800 with a score of 13591 atm
hope my gigabyte GT gets around those scores!! *when it finnaly arrives*
real sweet Oc'ing card you got there Angus
As stated I have found that my XFX xxxExtreme OC 640MB GTS Edition is definetly faster than the smaller 512MB GT..... Sweet as
My friends GT stutters when the AA is raised in games when my XFX xxxExtreme OC 640MB GTS Edition glides through, must be the higher amount of memory, GTS 640MB = GT's 512MB and the biggest diffrence being the Bus Bandwidth, GTS 320Bit and the GT's smaller 256Bit, I do like my games with the AA ramped up but with the GT's smaller memory and smaller 256Bit Buswidth its not a good upgrade from a GTS... Only until the G92's arrive early next year, will we will see a bigger diffrence in performance...
Last edited:
I'd be freaking terrified, that's the highest clock I've seen for a GT yet by a mile.
I'd get scanning for artifacts just to make sure, but as if it even displays at that.
Just the stock cooler (fan @ 60%)
O/clocking with rivatuner and no artifacts during 06 - both my GTS and GTX
shot there bolt at 634 core on the forest bench.
Not tried it during normal gaming as i was only messing trying to get the
upper limit (Was happy with 700) - but runs 3dmark06 fine and I noticed
Devious was getting 765 on the core on his GT so I thought i would ramp it
up a bit.
Temps vary between 73 - 78c over the 4 tests.
I'll give you £200 for it.