Associate
- Joined
- 27 Apr 2014
- Posts
- 859
Agree about the ram ,the dialogue I also receive with my paid copy,new stuff and all.Just ran Aida64 mem bench myself as was curious, got this dialogue at the end:
Whilst the latency is higher, it doesn't translate to any meaningful difference in productivity benchmarks.
G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 32GB (2 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4 SDRAM DDR4 4000 (PC4 32000) Intel XMP 2.0 Desktop Memory Model F4-4000C17D-32GVKBWhich memory sticks do you have?
It's interesting to note the much higher latency on Z690 with DDR4. If I run a lower/looser 3900Mhz C15-15-15-32 2T I get ~38ns.
Well Ram is Dual Rank and I just posted that you can in fact do 4000Mhz in Gear 1 with Dual Rank Ram on some Z690 Motherboards. The BIOS are not perfect yet and some boards people are have problems with Dual Rank.
Yes needless to say here for you but of course you can get ~38ns on older platforums, on Z690 not likely at all but someone will post a bench under 40 and think there the king.
Also I am not even bothered to try to set Ram timings as they are useless to me and my computer. I PC game at 4K and running Ram with 100ns makes no difference.
Also too many people stuck on Ram timings especially the ones trying to trick people into buying better Ram for there PC gaming,posting PC game benchmarks at 1080p with lowest settings on RTX 3090 and 12900K.