• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

** The Official ATI RV770/RV700 Series Review/Overclocking Thread **

I have a P5Q-delux with 2 HD4850's what do You need to know ?

Seen nothing much on 4870 results by Owners here, running on anything !

Can you try Crysis @ 1280x1024 all High DX9 32bit, and at 1680x1050

Would like to see how your's compare to mine on the P35
 
I have a P5Q-delux with 2 HD4850's what do You need to know ?

Seen nothing much on 4870 results by Owners here, running on anything !

Is it bandwidth limited in anyway?

For example, do you get 100%+ performance increase in xfire over one card in COD4 at verh high res/aa?

Or pick any other game in the Tweaktown review which showed a difference between the p45 and x38 boards as some games didn't or hardly showed any difference.
 
Can you try Crysis @ 1280x1024 all High DX9 32bit, and at 1680x1050

Would like to see how your's compare to mine on the P35

Got some numbers her for Crysis dx9 high settings@1680x1050
1 card 27.54 fps
xfire 41.425 fps 4xaa 24.31 fps .....245watts max power draw

These are from my notes i'll have to recheck for You
 
My Crossfire'd 4850's now seem happy enough at 675core 1100mem with a pair of Vortexx Neo's installed. Anything higher on the core and I get constant driver restarts. Plus everything is fine as long as I dont try and printscreen a screengrab, if I do that the machine hard locks.

At least I have not seen the GPU temp rise above 59c since installing the non-useless coolers.
 
Is it bandwidth limited in anyway?

For example, do you get 100%+ performance increase in xfire over one card in COD4 at verh high res/aa?

Or pick any other game in the Tweaktown review which showed a difference between the p45 and x38 boards as some games didn't or hardly showed any difference.

I asked Many times before getting My p5Q and satisfied myself there was a next to nothing performance Hit over the X48, now I would not like to say 2 super clocked 4870's would not be pushing the bandwith as I don't know !
what I can tell You is I put 2 3870's in the P45 and they picked up 3000 points in 3d2006 over a 2x8 pcix ver1 board
Your more likley to be Cpu limited before the 8x8 (16x16 old pciex money) bandwidth

Also You got that wrong, the higher the res/aa etc the lower the bandwidth requirements....unless I got that wrong ( xfire in 3d3006 gets not much less using 1600x1200 over default)
 
My Crossfire'd 4850's now seem happy enough at 675core 1100mem with a pair of Vortexx Neo's installed. Anything higher on the core and I get constant driver restarts. Plus everything is fine as long as I dont try and printscreen a screengrab, if I do that the machine hard locks.

At least I have not seen the GPU temp rise above 59c since installing the non-useless coolers.

layte, How do yours bench in Crysis
 
Got some numbers her for Crysis dx9 high settings@1680x1050
1 card 27.54 fps
xfire 41.425 fps 4xaa 24.31 fps .....245watts max power draw

These are from my notes i'll have to recheck for You

Hmmm, you actually get slower than I do with a P35...

@1680x105 all High

1 card = 35.03fps

xfire = 41.35fps

@ 4x AA

xfire = 25.14


What CPU speed you at? mine were done at 3.5Ghz
 
I asked Many times before getting My p5Q and satisfied myself there was a next to nothing performance Hit over the X48, now I would not like to say 2 super clocked 4870's would not be pushing the bandwith as I don't know !
what I can tell You is I put 2 3870's in the P45 and they picked up 3000 points in 3d2006 over a 2x8 pcix ver1 board
Your more likley to be Cpu limited before the 8x8 (16x16 old pciex money) bandwidth

Also You got that wrong, the higher the res/aa etc the lower the bandwidth requirements....unless I got that wrong ( xfire in 3d3006 gets not much less using 1600x1200 over default)

Well I don't think 3dmark06 shows up differences that well. Tweaktown showed no difference in performance between x48 and p45 boards. Lets face it, 3dmark06 is now cpulimited, not gpu limited nowadays.

And the higher the res/aa, the higher the bandwidth required I believe???? Unless I have got that wrong as well??????

I must admit Tweaktown showed hardly any difference up to 1680 x 1050 res, it was only 1920 x 1200 and above which started and showed the difference in performance between the p45 and x48.

So even of they were right, you will not notice anything at 1680 x 1050.

So where are all the people with xfire 4850's and 4870's running 1920 x 1200 + res on p45 boards to finally put my mind at ease.

If Tweaktown proven wrong I will gladly buy a p45 board tomorrow. If they are right I am stuck with spending more on a x38/48 board which I don't want to have to do really unless absolutely necessary.
 
I was in the same boat m8, but in the end I decided to just plump the extra £25 over a P5Q-Pro and bought a DFI DK X38-T2R, at £111 they are a steal and are cheaper than the high end P45 boards while giving the full 16x PCI-E 2.0 bandwidth.
 
Hmmm, you actually get slower than I do with a P35...

@1680x105 all High

1 card = 35.03fps

xfire = 41.35fps

@ 4x AA

xfire = 25.14


What CPU speed you at? mine were done at 3.5Ghz

:D:D Slight mistake :eek: I did say these were from My notes :) and the Cards were @ 500/993, I;ll quote and update My original, Also CPU is at 3.2GHZ
 
Got some numbers her for Crysis dx9 high settings@1680x1050
1 card 27.54 fps
xfire 41.425 fps 4xaa 24.31 fps .....245watts max power draw

These are from my notes i'll have to recheck for You
*THEY WERE AT 1600X1200 (UNSURE OF CLOCKS)and UNDERCLOCKED CROSSFIRE*

Ok P45 Motherboard [email protected] 2 x HD4850 @ stock 625/993
Crysis Bench dx9 High

1 card 35.04fps @4xaa 25.275fps System power 104Watt.....185watt MAX
2 cards 49.355fps @4xaa 30.295fps system power 144watt......260watt MAX

3d2006 Crossfire as above settings 18,946 sm 27831 sm3 8666 (no cpu score)
 
Well I don't think 3dmark06 shows up differences that well. Tweaktown showed no difference in performance between x48 and p45 boards. Lets face it, 3dmark06 is now cpulimited, not gpu limited nowadays.

And the higher the res/aa, the higher the bandwidth required I believe???? Unless I have got that wrong as well??????

I must admit Tweaktown showed hardly any difference up to 1680 x 1050 res, it was only 1920 x 1200 and above which started and showed the difference in performance between the p45 and x48.

So even of they were right, you will not notice anything at 1680 x 1050.

So where are all the people with xfire 4850's and 4870's running 1920 x 1200 + res on p45 boards to finally put my mind at ease.

If Tweaktown proven wrong I will gladly buy a p45 board tomorrow. If they are right I am stuck with spending more on a x38/48 board which I don't want to have to do really unless absolutely necessary.

What swung it for me, and the reason I still Use a X975 board is the running temps on the X38/48 end off ! But I would say from What I have seen the Gigabyte P45 has issues compared to the Asus, I still have a P965-6quad and its a fussy bugger not like the DS3/4's :)

Also I game at 1920x1200..forgot to mention
 
Last edited:
What sorta clocks can you get with standard coolers then aftermarket ones, really cant make my mind up if spending £32 on some coolers is worthwhile, I can see they drop the temps but does it help you overclock anymore?

Not that much for me and a few others but gurusan is cooking on gas :D
 
870mhz @ 1.365vGPU. Going to see if I can hit 900mhz on less than 1.375.

my cpu score seems a bit low, dunno why.

62258692zw3.jpg
 
This should put most of the pciex 8x8 to bed, It refers to the new top end Asus board :)

Quote..
The Maximus II Formula board features the new Intel P45 MCH and ICH10R Southbridge. As such, the board supports PCI Express 2.0 capability along with dual x8 PCIe operation in a CrossFire setup. The P35 supported a x16/x4 PCI Express 1.0 configuration with CrossFire that generally offered performance results up to 11% lower than the dual x16 setup on the X38/X48 chipsets. Although CrossFire runs in a dual x8 configuration, current performance results show it to be even with the X48/X38 boards with the HD 3870 video cards
 
This should put most of the pciex 8x8 to bed, It refers to the new top end Asus board :)

Quote..
The Maximus II Formula board features the new Intel P45 MCH and ICH10R Southbridge. As such, the board supports PCI Express 2.0 capability along with dual x8 PCIe operation in a CrossFire setup. The P35 supported a x16/x4 PCI Express 1.0 configuration with CrossFire that generally offered performance results up to 11% lower than the dual x16 setup on the X38/X48 chipsets. Although CrossFire runs in a dual x8 configuration, current performance results show it to be even with the X48/X38 boards with the HD 3870 video cards
From here :)

http://www.anandtech.com/weblog/showpost.aspx?i=455
 
Back
Top Bottom