Presumably some of what's been reported isn't true. Whyte and Hearn are playing word games - some of the detail in the reports might not be accurate, that doesn't mean the main point, that he tested positive for something, isn't true. Do you honestly believe that had this been completely untrue that neither Hearn nor Whyte would have directly said that he didn't fail a test? Of course they would, they'd be shouting it from the roof tops - Whyte's career and reputation is on the line.So why release a statement saying the reports are rubbish and lawyers are dealing with the false reports
Whether this failed test amounts to anything is another matter though.