FALSE, borrowing to grow the economy always reduces deficits faster than paying it down directly. It's really simple economics.
Yeah so simple you neglect the fact that if the growth is smaller than the deficit, you still have to borrow
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f0aa3/f0aa3284da715f2e0f63ba83fbb5bca66489846e" alt="Roll Eyes :rolleyes: :rolleyes:"
FALSE, borrowing to grow the economy always reduces deficits faster than paying it down directly. It's really simple economics.
labour really need to rename themselves they don't represent the labour force anymore.
Did the BBC just contradict itself?
They said all the scot votes were done and put up two still counting |:
Nhs will be on Gumtree by tomorrow morning and a roof tax will come in effect by dinner time
Well according to the Tories economic plan 2010, we shouldn't have a deficit now.
labour really need to rename themselves they don't represent the labour force anymore.
Actually you're twisting facts here, the SNP won over 50% in several seats and as their vote is concentrated in one area the result is entirely valid.
As for the rest of the seats - well that's what I've been saying all along, UKIP will do badly as their support is spread out around the country.
I notice you've mentioned SNP but not the tories who have around 35% of the vote in the UK but will likely have over 50% of the MPs, again down to concentration of supporters.
Heard about Ed Balls losing his seat on the way into work - delighted, icing on the cake for an SNP supporter like me. Labour destroyed in Scotland so they'll have to bring in fresh blood for the next elections, if Jim Murphy somehow doesn't go then they'll do no better next time though.
“If you can have full employment by killing Germans, why can’t we have full employment by building hospitals, building schools?”
I wonder too elmarko if the threat of LAB+SNP kept CON voters from swinging to UKIP. Might explain some of the swing from LAB to CON.
A Conservative majority will be very bad news for this country. At the very least it's easily the weakest mandate of a government ever. A Commons majority with only 37% of the popular vote is a recipe for dissatisfaction.
Nice to see the BBC nailed the exit poll. Also nice to see Farrage not winning his seat and throwing in the towel right now.
Only if the borrowing actually grows the economy. If the extra funds are wasted your principle doesn't workFALSE, borrowing to grow the economy always reduces deficits faster than paying it down directly. It's really simple economics.
Yep and imagine the whining and gnashing of teeth by you if he actually achieved it by cutting even further.
Doubt it. Labour still had no proper policies, a poorly run and negative campaign and an unexpected rise of Scottish nationalism.face facts his brother would have brought cameron down this week, when push came to shove many brits couldnt vote for el wierdo
labour really need to rename themselves they don't represent the labour force anymore.
Labour only have themselves to blame for this result. Their outrageous attacks on the SNP have backfired spectacularly, and as the threat of Scottish power rose, Tory voters turned out in their millions to counteract it.
As a result, the SNP has destroyed Labour in Scotland and the Tories have enjoyed a massive surge.
UKIP has picked up the protest vote (as expected) but that was never going to drag them out of political irrelevance.
nothing sinister in it just those are the ones that really stand out. an MP for every 0.1% of the vote. just highlights the inconsistencies around the system.
as a Scotsman I very much doubt it matters a jot to me who's in no 10. Jimmy Krankie. is going to be pulling a lot of weight in Westminister over the life of this parliament and that means whatever happens we are going to be well looked after up here. Sad but true we have things pretty easy up here courtesy of things like the Barnett formula giving us an extra 20% per head on services but that's for another thread