Poll: The official I voted/election results thread

Who did you vote for?

  • Alliance Party of Northern Ireland

    Votes: 4 0.3%
  • Conservative

    Votes: 518 39.5%
  • Democratic Unionist Party

    Votes: 6 0.5%
  • Green Party

    Votes: 65 5.0%
  • Labour

    Votes: 241 18.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 99 7.5%
  • Didn't vote / spoiled ballot

    Votes: 136 10.4%
  • Other party

    Votes: 6 0.5%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 6 0.5%
  • Respect Party

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • SNP

    Votes: 67 5.1%
  • Social Democratic and Labour Party

    Votes: 2 0.2%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 4 0.3%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 158 12.0%

  • Total voters
    1,313
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2003
Posts
14,612
I don't think that bothers them. They now have enough seats in parliament to kick up a fuss. And if the Tories aren't promoting any policies that will benefit the Scottish people, the SNP will just call for another referendum. Something that probably couldn't happen if Labour/SNP were in power.

The UK government has to grant a referendum, the SNP have been elected without a mandate for one. In short - they can't have another one, literally no way they can without being elected, including it in their manifesto and shouting about it during an election campaign.

They'd also loose if they had another one, probably worse than they did last year.

The English seem fixated on giving Scotland another one, the SNP are in Westminster to represent us, not break up the UK.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Mar 2008
Posts
32,769
The UK government has to grant a referendum, the SNP have been elected without a mandate for one. In short - they can't have another one, literally no way they can without being elected, including it in their manifesto and shouting about it during an election campaign.

They'd also loose if they had another one, probably worse than they did last year.

The English seem fixated on giving Scotland another one, the SNP are in Westminster to represent us, not break up the UK.

It would be ironic for the English sentiment to prove a second one correct.
 
Caporegime
Joined
22 Jun 2004
Posts
26,684
Location
Deep England
Ironically the Scottish vote actually significantly helped the Conservatives - exactly what the SNP didn't want!

Why do you think the SNP didn't want a Tory government? Suits their narrative perfectly I would say. Also the Tories and the SNP are backed by the same man - Rupert Murdoch.

Rupert+Murdoch.JPG
 
Soldato
Joined
27 Apr 2013
Posts
4,095
I hate this phrase, why can't rich people be left wingers?

Champagne socialist does not mean 'rich and left wing'. Not everyone on the left is a socialist and not everyone who sups champagne is 'rich'.

A champagne socialist is someone who lives high on the hog whilst espousing socialist values, making out that they are in touch with the common folk whilst never getting involved with them.

There are plenty of wealthy left-wingers who although I disagree with, I would not call champagne socialists.
 
Soldato
Joined
14 Jul 2003
Posts
14,612
Champagne socialist does not mean 'rich and left wing'. Not everyone on the left is a socialist and not everyone who sups champagne is 'rich'.

A champagne socialist is someone who lives high on the hog whilst espousing socialist values, making out that they are in touch with the common folk whilst never getting involved with them.

There are plenty of wealthy left-wingers who although I disagree with, I would not call champagne socialists.

So most of Labours now ex-MPs then?
 
Suspended
Joined
17 Oct 2011
Posts
5,707
Location
Buckingamshire
Look at the vote share and seats of the top three parties.

While its a small sample at the moment it's consistent with previous elections. Inner city (generally labour) and non English seats generally have far fewer people in their constituencies than those in generally conservative seats (small towns and countryside.

It's one of the reasons Labour were/are so against boundary changes and the conservatives wanted changes to make them more even, it benefits Labour and harms the conservatives consistent.

More than that, it simply isn't fair. What should happen is that an equal number of votes returns an equal number of seats, the current system doesn't accurately reflect voter intent throughout the country as a whole.
 
Soldato
Joined
18 Feb 2006
Posts
9,637
RIP NHS for starters. Get used to paying to see your doctor.

I'd gladly pay a tocken fee to see a NHS GP if it was as pleasant as seeing my NHS dentist (<5 minute wait, doesn't feel like they are rushing through your appointment, more competant etc). It's not like seeing a GP is free if they need to prescribe some drugs. Prescriptions cost me a small fortune last time I went (and I only went in there expecting one prescription...)

Nice to see Theresa May championing her snoopers agenda straight away.....


RIP privacy

I'm hoping enough back benchers rebel against this. I will certainly be putting pressure on my MP...
 
Back
Top Bottom