UKIP get short changed because of the way the voting system is setup. They should get 12% of the seats and not just 1.
and cue the next 5 years of ukipper rhetoric
Proportional rep blah blah
UKIP get short changed because of the way the voting system is setup. They should get 12% of the seats and not just 1.
Or Scottish mps are barred from voting on English only legislation in return for more devolved powers.
A very scary future.
A separated Scotland, EU referendum which will probably end up leaving. And all of us knowing what Greece feels like.
So where are the UKIP voters who made £50 bet they would get more than 4 seats?
I want to see screen shots.
The problem is if you start changing boundaries, it's very subjective. As you said any changes favour one party over another.
How can can anyone make that call? If you let me do it I'll just make it favour what I want.
Also I believe there are arguments that the electoral register numbers don't properly reflect population numbers. So it depends which you base it on.
Wake up, turn the TV on... wow.
What have you people done?!![]()
Excellent summary in the Telegraph reasoning why Labour lost, in a nutshell, the wrong Leader,elected by the Unions not the grass roots, a man who was unwilling to accept Labours past economic screw ups and instead chose to defend them, a man urged when elected to put a professions team around him, instead he chose ideological soul mates, he had to choose between the centre ground - where Blair succeeded - instead he went for the comfort zone of the left....
Ultimately, a man who made all the wrong choices and thank God he only made those wrong choices for the Labour Party and not for the country as our Prime Minister.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/gen...e-this-election-It-never-tried-to-win-it.html
New speaker of the house for a start lol
You missed it by 3 hours you plumb![]()
The problem for Labour is that they don't really have anyone suitable to become the next leader. There is a real deficit in charisma and leadership in Labour, plus they've too many champagne socialists.
The UK government has to grant a referendum, the SNP have been elected without a mandate for one. In short - they can't have another one, literally no way they can without being elected, including it in their manifesto and shouting about it during an election campaign.
They'd also loose if they had another one, probably worse than they did last year.
The English seem fixated on giving Scotland another one, the SNP are in Westminster to represent us, not break up the UK.
and cue the next 5 years of ukipper rhetoric
Proportional rep blah blah
Just get rid of boundaries entirely. Vote for a party rather than a named individual for a party.
What major changes are the Tories going to/likely to push through?
So the Pollsters get wrong again, even the exit polls weren't wholly accurate.
I keep wondering if the BBC is wholesale colour-blind, they keep saying Libdems are yellow...i see Orange :|