The very legal definition of a riot is of 12 or more people.
only if they declare it a riot which they're usually very unwilling to do.
The very legal definition of a riot is of 12 or more people.
Still no mention at all on the BBC. ITV News reported it very briefly before moving onto general political stuff. Does look like they've all been asked not to report it.
Still no mention at all on the BBC. ITV News reported it very briefly before moving onto general political stuff. Does look like they've all been asked not to report it.
![]()
Supposedly anti-tory protests taking place in the capital, and the met have asked the BBC not to report.
It was mentioned an hour ago on the BBC.
DERP DERP MEDIA BLACKOUT!
I have to say I do feel sorry for the LibDems and what they've experienced is yet another effect of our fundamentally flawed system.
They've obviously been punished heavily for their perceived "sell out" in forming a coalition with the Conservatives but what exactly where they supposed to do?
They received so much criticism from their supporters for back-tracking on promises such as tuition fees but these people seem to be forgetting one simple fact - they didn't win! They came third in the 2010 election and were in the position of making a simple choice - do we form a coalition with one of the two main parties, try to influence them and fight for some of our principles whilst accepting we'll have to sacrifice others, or refuse to form such a coalition and fight on a vote-by-vote basis in parliament?
Presumably those who criticised them so much would rather they'd stick to their principles and done the latter yet the reality is they'd have had very little influence and would quite possibly have achieved far less than they did.
The thing is, with our flawed FPTP system, the 2010 result was the best the LibDems were ever likely to achieve. They were never going to win power outright so the 2010 result gave them the best chance they'd ever have of actually having some serious influence in government. Of course they had to take it, even if it meant sacrificing some things. It's this to which Clegg refers when he talks of "doing the right thing for the country if not the party" and I agree with him.
Gove to Justice. I guess it was too much to expect them to appoint someone with a legal background after Grayling?
When you systematically crush sections of society and remove hope from them, then people will always take to the streets.
Probably less a case of finding someone for the position and more a case of finding a position where Gove can't do as much damage.
So you have to go to the Election 2015 section then scroll down two pages for the link? Why is this not on the main page? Definitely being suppressed to some degree.
David needs to put the "Sicssors" down apparently, excellent advice.
![]()