In a month's time, "Let's play wait until September for the actual cards."
The launch of this gen has been, and continues to be, painful to live through (for those of us who need a new card pronto! Need, yes. Mine is dying
![Frown :( :(](/styles/default/xenforo/vbSmilies/Normal/frown.gif)
).
In which case I'm glad that the good 1440p/144Hz monitors aren't yet affordable (or that I don't yet have the money to buy one). If I got a swanky new GPU, I'd need a monitor to be able to make use of the increased power. I don't think 1080p60 is appropriate considering that's what I already do with my 970.
I bet Nvidia didn't show jack because they have nought to show. Expect Pascal for consumers in 2017 folks. Until then, I guess Polaris will be the one to tide us over. And depending on how fast Vega releases afterwarfds and how good it is, Nvidia may be down a point at the start of this new generation with their late cards.
I remember this time last year folks were badgering AMD for being late (myself included), now it's the other way around lol.
I'm wondering about the Polaris 10 demo and the things we could have known if Nvidia had done similarly, like what ports. VGA is unlikely and similarly DVI. For those who don't have DP/HDMI monitors, there's products like
this to help. AMD are touting 1440p, perhaps Pascal wasn't as good as the Polaris 10 demo and Nvidia has gone back to the drawing board after scraping plans to show consumer Pascal? Just a random guess, but I'd laugh if I was right.