they sold by the truck load then nvidia whacked the price to £500+
But did they or was it the retailers?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
they sold by the truck load then nvidia whacked the price to £500+
I wouldn't consider a GTX 780TI for £300 bargain basement, significantly cheaper than it was but next to a GTX 970 for £250+ not even close. 290X were going for £250 and less at the time too.
Like the GTX 980 and up now the 780TI was one of those cards that had a lot of E-Peen Tax.
Of course they will... market dictates they MUST. They can't and won't release a 8GB GDDR5X GPU that is SLOWER than a 980Ti, they wouldn't sell any LOL! I don't even know how they'd manage that, but it won't happen and they'd NEVER get away with it if they tried (which they won't). The million dollar question is how much more powerful it will be AND at what price. 10% more for the same price as a Ti, no thanks (especially with inevitable Ti price drop). 20%+ more for less money... now we're talking. We shall find out soon enough anyway...
I think they will want longevity from their new product line and just trickle feed gimped crap with marginal speed increases for the next 3 years
I don't think anything is gonna turn up that makes the 980ti look crap.
It should beat it,otherwise it will be the first time since the 9800GTX that a Nvidia high end card of a new generation has not beaten the fastest single GPU card of the previous one.
I would like something to turn up and make 4k look as easy to drive as 1080p.
Yeah, thats not going to happen.
Haha aye I know, which leaves me thinking that maybe I can live with my 980 a bit longer.
Fermi is evidence to the contrary. It took a whole new series of cards to polish that particular lump of... coal.Think they were first up last round too.imo NVidia products always hit the market fully developed polished products
Fermi is evidence to the contrary. It took a whole new series of cards to polish that particular lump of... coal.
I'm allowed to get annoyed at things man. I'm not losing sleep over it, dont worry. I get annoyed at somebody pushing past me in a crowd, too. Whether it's on the internet or not is irrelevant.Chill bro, it is only an internet forum, no need to get annoyed over the "internet"
Well at least you admit it's not evidence of them doing what was accused of them here. That's a start.And no it is not evidence of them paying developers off (your charge against me...) but it shows that nvidia have tried to apply pressure so who knows what they might do or offer to other developers especially games that they "sponsor". You said that there was no rational discussion or merit on claims to suggest that nvidia pay companies to do said things but that shows that they already put "pressure" on developers, which could take various forms PS. I never specifically said that nvidia 'paying off developers', which seems to be your central charge at me
Has nothing to do with what we were talking about. Here I was thinking you might finally start understanding the point, but nope, you're still going to sit here and try and say there's some merit to the argument because they did something else.So question back at you, do you deny that nvidia have not applied pressure to game developers to exclude features that benefit their competition in the past?
You haven't at all explained why the analogy is 'stupid'. It's clearly just your instinct to state it is so as it's inconvenient to your argument.And I'm afraid, stupid analogy is still stupid because you are comparing 2 different things, murder and theft. I am only being sceptical and high lighting the "possibility" that nvida has put "pressure" on developers to do said stuff as they did with oxide.
This has little to do with the hardware, and more to do with the software stack. Under DX11, drivers are always going play a significant role. Under DX12, they play a much smaller role, though it then places a lot more emphasis on the developers to implement and optimize all the features that the drivers use to take care of for them automatically(more or less).Kind of hoping Pascal is less driver optimisation dependent than Kepler and Maxwell, but I gather not much has changed.
It should beat it,otherwise it will be the first time since the 9800GTX that a Nvidia high end card of a new generation has not beaten the fastest single GPU card of the previous one. Even in that case,they priced the card relatively cheaply compared to the 8800GTX.