** The Official Nvidia GeForce 'Pascal' Thread - for general gossip and discussions **

[gerardfraser]

So glad I sold my last 980Ti card for good money a couple days ago.

 

[MrSniper]

I am waiting on price! Any idea when we will find out ?

 

[Digital X]

Well I got my 980ti back today, but it's looking like it will be finding a new home if the 1080 price is right.

Very impressed with what I've seen. What res was those games running at btw? tomb raider, division etc.

 

[PhysicsMan94]

What in the hell is that graph, it starts at 1 but no card is listed at 1. Gts 960 is at 1.5.... what kind of BS graph is that.

GTX 960 1.4 lets call it, Titan at 3.5 ish, 1080 at 4.5 ish? So he's saying in best case it's 4.5x faster than what, a GTX 950?

Also when talking to a room of gamers it seems and Apple like Nvidia fanboys, the one feature he highlights about Pascal is how stable power delivery is?

> DM in damage-control mode.

 

[AllBodies]

Looking at their graph, it looked like Titan X was about 3.7 relative performance, and 1080 was 4.3 or 4.4

So, with some rounding, they're basically claiming 15-20% faster than Titan X.

 

[easyrider]

Interesting no mention was made of a comparison with a single 980ti

 

[Smrtka]

there was no mention of 980TI compared vs 1080 is that something we should worry ?

 

[Rroff]

What in the hell is that graph, it starts at 1 but no card is listed at 1. Gts 960 is at 1.5.... what kind of BS graph is that.

GTX 960 1.4 lets call it, Titan at 3.5 ish, 1080 at 4.5 ish? So he's saying in best case it's 4.5x faster than what, a GTX 950?

Also when talking to a room of gamers it seems and Apple like Nvidia fanboys, the one feature he highlights about Pascal is how stable power delivery is?

Looks like 3.5-3.6 and 4.4 which is what somewhere around 25% faster? hard to make out.

 

[maonayze]

Tim Sweeney is definately sucking d**** here.

 

[sam77]

I would just like to say, to all the nay-sayers and morons who couldn't realize the significance of transistor count:
I TOLD YOU SO!
Well, we told you so. But I did too.

 

[Random Guy Esq.]

I am waiting on price! Any idea when we will find out ?

Well, he said that it cost billions in R&D......

 

[easyrider]

there was no mention of 980TI compared vs 1080 is that something we should worry ?

Sit tight my friend...

 

[drunkenmaster]

> DM in damage-control mode.

Yeah, Nvidia showed a graph comparing performance of their latest and greatest by having a 960Gtx not even be the baseline performance... it's way way faster on this massively misleading graph that doesn't even say what actual gpu it's being compared to.

 

[AlamoX]

2x980 performance 4k60fps on single gpu is possible then, honestly i am so surprised didnt expect this much performance this soon, i bet AMD headquarter is in full panic mode right now
so 1080 should be 60-70% faster than 980Ti

 

[easyrider]

I would just like to say, to all the nay-sayers and morons who couldn't realize the significance of the transistor count:
I TOLD YOU SO!

Come on ....wait for benchies...troll with 58 posts

 

[Drojman]

They probably didn't mention the TI so they didn't highlight how close it was in power to the Titan X.

 

[D.P.]

Which as we saw 3D mark benches 20-40% faster than stock 980ti that all makes sense.

 

[AllBodies]

Looks like 3.5-3.6 and 4.4 which is what somewhere around 25% faster? hard to make out.

Yeah it's really hard to tell precisely...no doubt their intention.

Still, even if it's just 20% faster than a Titan X, that's still really good for a chip that size (and maybe it'll overclock well?)

 

[humbug]

2x980 performance 4k60fps on single gpu is possible then, honestly i am so surprised didnt expect this much performance this soon, i bet AMD headquarter is in full panic mode right now

I doubt it....

 

[Doogles]

Tim Sweeney is definately sucking d**** here.

lol I agree, looks like it might be the first time he has done so.