Look over on AVForums, saw a couple sell the other day for around £430 each
You mean before the pascal performance and pricing was released.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Look over on AVForums, saw a couple sell the other day for around £430 each
Will we see a price crash on the Titan X now that it's been surpassed by the 1080 ?
Stock cooling dude. They've obviously seen how popular they are
What i want to know is will Nvidia now support VESA standard Adaptive Sync with Pascal?
They have no excuse not to now.
Indeed
Real world benches are needed and if the 1080 is on par with a clocked 980ti give and take I see no reason to get one...
Might aswell wait until 1080ti.
While we should always wait for actual reviews, there's very little reason to doubt any of the claims overall.I think a lot you guys should wait on real world performance before jumping the gun. Nvidia are very clever in how they market there hardware.
AFAIK it still isn't a mandatory part of DP 1.4 - I'm guessing nVidia will hold out as long as they can
What i want to know is will Nvidia now support VESA standard Adaptive Sync with Pascal?
They have no excuse not to now.
Assuming that the DP 1.3/1.4 is all that is needed hardware wise...
1. "pressure" monitor manufacturers to disable the feature on the monitor firmware side (I'd be very surprised if they did this given that intel will be supporting it in the future)
2. disable it in their own drivers, I assume some kid could hack it though....
I game at 2K on a 144hz monitor and I want to get as close to a consistent 90 frames plus as I possible can. On my current card, a 980ti, with a lot of modern games I can't achieve this so the 1080 is unlikely to be a card i'll ignore IF I can get a reasonable good return for my current 980ti that is.
So who are these new cards aimed at?
If you want 1080p/1440p performance then a 980Ti comfortably nets you 60fps+ at either resolution. If Nvidia started dropping 980Ti prices for the slightly more powerful 1080, wouldn't common sense be to get the Ti instead? Nvidia aren't stupid, they lower the prices and the 1080 loses out in sales.
A 980Ti starts to show its limitations when gaming at 4K/60fps with all the bells and whistles in the more demanding titles. A Titan X has those same limitations, so that instantly makes a GTX 1070 nothing more than a more power efficient card to compete at 1080p/1440p. Not exactly 'next gen'.
I think anyone who's using a 970 or below at the moment would probably find the 1070 a good upgrade path if they want to game flawlessly at 1440p/60fps for the next couple years.
Anyone on a 980 or above should wait for the 1080Ti if they want to go 4K, the Ti version should be the real killer at 4K res and it also allows the 4K monitor market to catch up with the newer ports.
Good cards from NV. They brought the performance what was needed.
Did they mention any architectural changes, or is this a 16nm high clocked maxwell?
I would like to see if clocked the same how much faster the 1080 is but it is insane clocks that is for sure I just wonder what it has left in the tank a how much more it can over clock from out of the box?.
Assuming that the DP 1.3/1.4 is all that is needed hardware wise...
1. "pressure" monitor manufacturers to disable the feature on the monitor firmware side (I'd be very surprised if they did this given that intel will be supporting it in the future)
2. disable it in their own drivers, I assume some kid could hack it though....
Love how people are still wanting over £400 for their 980ti's, good luck with that!