• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

** The Official Nvidia GeForce 'Pascal' Thread - for general gossip and discussions **

Caporegime
Joined
23 Apr 2014
Posts
30,003
Location
Chadsville
It can also help keep some value to the card. The original Titan and Titan Black 2nd hand prices didn't drop as sharply as the TX did, 980ti being released soon after also didn't help.
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,769
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
The compute engine on these cards can be somewhere of a hindrance to the architecture in gaming terms, for a start it will use more power, and the reason Maxwell is clocking 1400Mhz+ is probably because the compute engine is stripped out.

Maybe they should have two branches of GPU's, one Workstation and one Gaming.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,624
I'm pretty sure Nvidia will go that route in the future. The cost savings of a single core doesn't make sense when ultimately they will need to be doing different things.

Nvidia are very worried about Intel Xeon Phi so I can see once volta is out that PGPUs and compute hardware become separate chips, although with a somewhat shared architecture.
 
Associate
Joined
8 May 2014
Posts
2,288
Location
france
TSMC Hit Harder than Expected by Recent Taiwan Earthquake

The recent 6.4 magnitude Taiwan earthquake, which hit the island nation on February 6th, affected TSMC worse than expected. Taiwan's premier semiconductor foundry, TSMC, had initially expected semiconductor wafer shipments to be down by less than 1%, but it is now emerging that the drop in shipments could be higher, because the damage to one of its facilities, Fab-14, is worse than originally assessed.


TSMC, in an official communication to its clients, assured that 95% of the foundry machines could return to functionality within 2-3 days after the earthquake. To that effect, machines in Fab-6 and Fab-14B have been fully restored. Despite the disaster, the company appears confident of reaching revenue targets of US $5.9-6.0 billion for Q1-2016. TSMC is the primary foundry partner of major fabless semiconductor companies, such as Qualcomm, NVIDIA, and AMD. AMD recently moved its next-generation GPU manufacturing to Korean silicon giant Samsung, while NVIDIA is building its next "Pascal" GPU family on TSMC's process.


source : Techpowerup
 
Caporegime
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
48,769
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
The recent 6.4 magnitude Taiwan earthquake, which hit the island nation on February 6th, affected TSMC worse than expected. Taiwan's premier semiconductor foundry, TSMC, had initially expected semiconductor wafer shipments to be down by less than 1%, but it is now emerging that the drop in shipments could be higher, because the damage to one of its facilities, Fab-14, is worse than originally assessed.


TSMC, in an official communication to its clients, assured that 95% of the foundry machines could return to functionality within 2-3 days after the earthquake. To that effect, machines in Fab-6 and Fab-14B have been fully restored. Despite the disaster, the company appears confident of reaching revenue targets of US $5.9-6.0 billion for Q1-2016. TSMC is the primary foundry partner of major fabless semiconductor companies, such as Qualcomm, NVIDIA, and AMD. AMD recently moved its next-generation GPU manufacturing to Korean silicon giant Samsung, while NVIDIA is building its next "Pascal" GPU family on TSMC's process.


source : Techpowerup

Condolences to those effected.

With that said i still hope this doesn't delay Pascal.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
33,188
Of course but a certain set of people who had no interest in buying Maxwell made a big fuss about it. I found it funny at the time and seeing that slide reminded me of it was all :D

That was the difference Greg. The ones that made the fuss didnt actually know what DP is. You can spot them a mile off.

lol, same people as usual attempting to rewrite history. nvidia guys, in particular one of you, kept excusing the first Titan's price as being cheap because it offered big DP performance which meant it was great for guys who do compute at home (which is basically no one at all). In fact when everyone else laughed at you guys for throwing £800-900 on a card because it was cheap for home compute/DP performance, the guys desperate to defend Nvidia kept banging on and on and on about how DP was fantastic.

When Titan X came along and was the same price without DP, we pointed that out because the same guys were suddenly billing it as a cheap gaming card and how pointless DP was.

The only people who made a fuss about DP performance itself, was you guys, the people who 'made a fuss' about lacking DP performance in Maxwell were the guys pointing out the hypocrisy of you guys defending the Titan price entirely down to DP/professional card being cheap argument then doing a complete u-turn on this argument when DP went missing in the follow up cards.

DP isn't important for gaming, never was, it also was a horrific reason to 'defend' the first Titan's pricing which as above was compounded when the arguments changed with Titan X losing that single advantage but staying the same price.

The fact also remains that removing compute performance saves power and performance which is a large reason Maxwell is 'more efficient' and smaller compared to Kepler. The fact also appears to remain that as expected Pascal has DP performance and hardware scheduling put back which will have the opposite effect and harm efficiency and increase die size as opposed to a similar gaming powered Maxwell card.
 
Caporegime
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
32,624
In what way are you defining 'true' here? Maxwell is a proper architecture and made some really significant improvements over Kepler.

People really underestimate how significant a change Maxwell was. Maxwell was a massive new step for Nvidia, pascal on the other hand is going to be a much smaller change. The next major architecture from nvidia is going to be Volta, Pascal is just a stop-gap. If Maxwell could have been released on 20mm then Pascal might not have even existed, except perhaps as a pipe cleaner part to test HBM2 memory controllers
 
Back
Top Bottom