• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The Official OCUK Cinebench R20 benchmark Thread ***

harry5522 said:
Couldn't be fussed figuring it out again myself so used a calculator.

OM2ZmFe.png


Also technically would you actually add those percentages together? Surely having a 7% increase in core clock doesn't equate to adding 7% onto your ipc.
Click to expand...

Surly that's wrong given that your example calculation is a percentage difference value, not a base line to increase to get to an end value.

So if Value A is a score of 348 and the measure in that is 100% what added value in percentage terms would it take to a score of 506?

Take 348 as a value of 100% and add your example of 37% to it (IE make the value 137%), you get a score of 478, 37% of 348 = 129 add to the 348 value and you get 478.

Now take 348 and add 45%, you get about 505, 45% of 348 = 157 add to 348 = 505.

Then the difference in clock speed, which is 7%.
 
humbug said:
Surly that's wrong given that your example calculation is a percentage difference value, not a base line to increase to get to an end value.

So if Value A is a score of 348 and the measure in that is 100% what added value in percentage terms would it take to a score of 506?

Take 348 as a value of 100% and add your example of 37% to it (IE make the value 137%), you get a score of 478, 37% of 348 = 129 add to the 348 value and you get 478.

Now take 348 and add 45%, you get about 505, 45% of 348 = 157 add to 348 = 505.

Then the difference in clock speed, which is 7%.
Click to expand...

This is the right calculation.
 
Managed to get this at 4.5GHz on 3600 at 1.25v. Had no luck with doing the same with all cores. That would need more volts and I think I do not want to go above 1.25v going forward as that increases temps and I would prefer not to push the CPU too hard which could maybe lead to degrading.

Ryzen-3600-4-5-GHz-1-25v.jpg




Below is my 4.4GHz so far rock solid overclock :)

Ryzen-3600-4-4-GHz-1-25v.jpg
 
About time I added mine now that I finally did some sort of over clocking for 4.3Ghz All core.
I'm sure I can go higher but it's good enough for now.

WkdDhnh.jpg

A 7767, not bad at all for a 3900x on a x370 board. And over 400 higher than my PBO enabled score.

Add me to the MC scoreboard!:p
 
tommoT.Striker said:
About time I added mine now that I finally did some sort of over clocking for 4.3Ghz All core.
I'm sure I can go higher but it's good enough for now.

WkdDhnh.jpg

A 7767, not bad at all for a 3900x on a x370 board. And over 400 higher than my PBO enabled score.

Add me to the MC scoreboard!:p
Click to expand...
Do single thread also if you can ;)

And yeah, add us @humbug


8o7oQm0.png

Please? :p
 
Last edited:
New record. I have got 4.5GHz all core working on Cinebench. It spat out an error message when I tried 1.3v. Bumping it to 1.325 solved that :D

Cinebench-R20-Ryzen-3600-4-5-GHz-1-325v.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom