• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The Official OCUK Cinebench R20 benchmark Thread ***

Caporegime
OP
Joined
17 Mar 2012
Posts
47,382
Location
ARC-L1, Stanton System
Couldn't be fussed figuring it out again myself so used a calculator.

OM2ZmFe.png


Also technically would you actually add those percentages together? Surely having a 7% increase in core clock doesn't equate to adding 7% onto your ipc.

Surly that's wrong given that your example calculation is a percentage difference value, not a base line to increase to get to an end value.

So if Value A is a score of 348 and the measure in that is 100% what added value in percentage terms would it take to a score of 506?

Take 348 as a value of 100% and add your example of 37% to it (IE make the value 137%), you get a score of 478, 37% of 348 = 129 add to the 348 value and you get 478.

Now take 348 and add 45%, you get about 505, 45% of 348 = 157 add to 348 = 505.

Then the difference in clock speed, which is 7%.
 
Associate
Joined
5 May 2017
Posts
142
Surly that's wrong given that your example calculation is a percentage difference value, not a base line to increase to get to an end value.

So if Value A is a score of 348 and the measure in that is 100% what added value in percentage terms would it take to a score of 506?

Take 348 as a value of 100% and add your example of 37% to it (IE make the value 137%), you get a score of 478, 37% of 348 = 129 add to the 348 value and you get 478.

Now take 348 and add 45%, you get about 505, 45% of 348 = 157 add to 348 = 505.

Then the difference in clock speed, which is 7%.

This is the right calculation.
 

TNA

TNA

Caporegime
Joined
13 Mar 2008
Posts
27,182
Location
Greater London
Managed to get this at 4.5GHz on 3600 at 1.25v. Had no luck with doing the same with all cores. That would need more volts and I think I do not want to go above 1.25v going forward as that increases temps and I would prefer not to push the CPU too hard which could maybe lead to degrading.

Ryzen-3600-4-5-GHz-1-25v.jpg




Below is my 4.4GHz so far rock solid overclock :)

Ryzen-3600-4-4-GHz-1-25v.jpg
 
Associate
Joined
1 Jun 2019
Posts
447
About time I added mine now that I finally did some sort of over clocking for 4.3Ghz All core.
I'm sure I can go higher but it's good enough for now.

WkdDhnh.jpg

A 7767, not bad at all for a 3900x on a x370 board. And over 400 higher than my PBO enabled score.

Add me to the MC scoreboard!:p
 

TNA

TNA

Caporegime
Joined
13 Mar 2008
Posts
27,182
Location
Greater London
About time I added mine now that I finally did some sort of over clocking for 4.3Ghz All core.
I'm sure I can go higher but it's good enough for now.

WkdDhnh.jpg

A 7767, not bad at all for a 3900x on a x370 board. And over 400 higher than my PBO enabled score.

Add me to the MC scoreboard!:p
Do single thread also if you can ;)

And yeah, add us @humbug


8o7oQm0.png

Please? :p
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom