[TW]Fox;29689159 said:This is basically the sum of the Leave argument for most things.
'it was fine in the 1920s'.
The whole referendum was about democratic accountability.
Sure, but what makes you think you're now in a better position to fulfil that demand compared to the unified European market? Especially considering that 10 years is pretty much what it will take to even have negotiated new treaties (never mind an actual recovery). E.g. http://shanghaiist.com/2016/06/24/china_brexit_response.php
Why is everything you post in response to me just swear words? I'd like to have a rational debate about this but you seem unwilling to debate with me on anything I raise.
I respect the Leave campaign absolutely and there are reasons for leaving but you're unfortunately representing the view I proposed, that a lot of leave voters have voted on the basis of being angry and not on the basis of facts or rational opinion. And that makes me very sad.
the fishing fleet now will also consist of type 45 destoryers and astute nuclear subs
This is completely untrue. Boston had the biggest % of people voting to leave the EU. Coincidentally, they have the highest concentration Eastern Europeans in the UK.
Just think we can have proper light bulbs again.
Just think we can have proper light bulbs again.
Quicker to agree terms with two people at the table, rather than 29?What makes you think the UK will see a speedier process? Or do you think trade treaties are done overnight?
I'll repeat my previous link: http://shanghaiist.com/2016/06/24/china_brexit_response.php
Come on, head out of sand! As a result of the Leave vote, in time UK citizens will be able to hold lawmakers to greater democratic account than before (ie, in comparison to when the unelected and unaccountable EU Commission decided laws and made us subject to them).
Just spoke to someone who couldn't make her mind up so let her six year old choose in the booth.
[TW]Fox;29689099 said:How much did you take the trouble to understand about the CFP before forming an opinion on it?
[TW]Fox;29689207 said:Great news, badk to pointlessly inefficient and wasteful lighting!
Who is going to bother making them just for us though?
[TW]Fox;29689207 said:Great news, badk to pointlessly inefficient and wasteful lighting!
Who is going to bother making them just for us though?
You heard it here guys! First there was fishing with dynamite, now we fish with tactical nuclear missiles!
Just think we can have proper light bulbs again.
Quicker to agree terms with two people at the table, rather than 29?
Who told our fishermen to stop fishing in our own waters?