@TheVoice your not buying a console because of the ds4 battery life, it's really not that bad. Mine is connected back to console every night and i've never seen the low battery sign, with my longest session probably about 6 hours (damn work
)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c52ff/c52ff17eea75f5fa374792d68c3cb4c06c406d96" alt="Wink ;) ;)"
@TheVoice your not buying a console because of the ds4 battery life, it's really not that bad. Mine is connected back to console every night and i've never seen the low battery sign, with my longest session probably about 6 hours (damn work)
The controller will go all day and more, if you need more than that you have issues.
It may as well just be a wired controller in that case. I'm sure as hell not buying one until they improve the battery life.
I don't really think its a big issue
There is plenty of life in the controller, stop getting your knickers in a twist, buy two if it's going to be a problem which it's not, i have two charging in a dock when not using the ps4, have done many a hour gaming and have yet to see mine go below two bars.
I'm not buying the PS4 yet for a multitude of reasons I've already discussed on here (despite having a pre-order initially), but yes, poor battery life is one more reason. If it's bad now, it's going to be even worse in a few years time when wear and tear has taken effect.
That's a bit like telling someone to buy two phones when they're not happy with their battery life. Absurd.
Anyway, nice to see that the Christmas spirit hasn't dampened the defensive, hostile mentality of the forum.
I'd rather not be paying full whack to beta-test a product.
PS4 is selling so well can't see price drop any time soon from Sony especially when there is no competition regarding price.
First of all we aren't beta testing anything, the console is a retail released device and works brilliantly and is far more powerful than its direct competition.
Second of all its the cheapest top end console ever made, if you think £349 is top whack then I take it your either extremely tight or poor.
My phone costs about that much for example.
Obviously it will be cheaper in two years time but so will my phone, so too are games if you wait two years after their original release.
Its certainly not overpriced and nowhere near top whack. Its also worth paying for now than waiting two years to save £50-£75
Thirdly its also not an issue for you unless you plan on gaming for longer than 10+ hours in one straight session.
It just means that you need to plug it in more often when your not using the console. If you plug it in after every gaming session your fine
I hate you right now...Enough of this now, the Australian summer is calling and sitting indoors on an message board isn't going to get me a tan.
I hate you right now...
ps3ud0![]()
Snip
ps3ud0![]()
Yeah its not a massive issue, but I can identify with the swathe of people that wont have the PS4 camera who wonder the value of the light beyond controller identification (and for that purpose lets be honest its overkill). I can see it easily affording most people another 'average days worth of gaming' if it was toned down so I dont think its a small insignificant win.Could just have a option to turn it off but if the camera is plugged in it's auto set to on.
It just isn't really needed without the camera for anything other than identifying which controller is which. Could hold the option button to turn the light on or something for that. It needs to be thought about and sorted.