Man of Honour
- Joined
- 27 Sep 2004
- Posts
- 25,821
- Location
- Glasgow
Historical reasons are a convenient excuse if you ask me. It's tribal, etavistic behaviour that you'd think people would have grown out of by now.
People are still tribal about lots of things, you can hope that they'll grow out of it but as a species we're pretty slow about making advances sometimes.
Thanks for the explanation. I still think it is a daft behaviour when we want to keep some sort of unity. A bit of friendly rivalry is great and necessary but the clear disdain for one another I find strange and a shame.
It's a noble sentiment that we should all stick together and I really hope we would but the people who are anti-English quite possibly aren't the ones who want to keep unity in the Union. It is important to remember it's just a game though and I rather think that sometimes we get rather too invested in it.
By comparison a big deal for Scottish rugby is if they narrowly beat Argentina in the 6 nations.
Darn tooting, it's a big deal. I'd go so far as to say miraculous, Argentina aren't even in the 6 Nations.
I'd take the point that Scotland's expectations are lower but I'm fine with that, the consistently inconsistent performances from our national sporting teams (with the possible exception of curling) mean that it pays to enjoy the rare wins when they come but not to get too carried away either, a loss is probably just around the corner. Scotland's national teams don't half encourage a sense of perspective and realism about their relative place in the world and I like that about them.