Closer look at camera with comparisons to iPhone 11 Pro, Note 10 and Pixel 4
https://www.inputmag.com/reviews/samsung-galaxy-s20-ultra-review-camera-comparison-flawed-autofocus
Samsung have reportedly in the last day or so pushed an update to resolve the auto focus issues so we’ll have to see how that fairs now. How and why that wasn’t resolved earlier is...
To me the ultra doesn’t really sound worth it over the regular models.
Be interesting to see S20 ultra v S20/+ not expecting a huge difference though.
A $1,400 letdown
Samsung wants people to believe the S20 Ultra is a new beginning — it's got a new name after all — but I'm just sad the cameras don't live up to the hype.
The ridiculous zoom range is bananas and the image quality for photos is sharper compared to previous flagship phones like the Galaxy S10 and Note 10, but the highest 100x zoom is so low-res and shaky to shoot with it may as well not exist. I had wanted the 100x to not be a gimmick, but it is.
I also wanted the S20 Ultra's cameras to give the iPhone 11 Pro a real beatdown. It's been too long since anyone with any amount of weight was a real threat to Apple. But alas, the iPhone 11 Pro cameras are still better in nearly every way that matters: dynamic range, sharpness, color accuracy, and video.
If you're thinking that $1,400 will automatically buy you better photos and videos, you should probably get an iPhone.
You can for sure get some decent photos and videos with the S20 Ultra if you put in the work (like using the "pro" mode). But if you're thinking that ponying up $1,400 will automatically buy you better photos and videos, you should probably get an iPhone.
With the autofocusing issues, I can't recommend the S20 Ultra. At least, not until Samsung fixes it. Other than the beefy cameras, all of the other features on the S20 Ultra — the 120Hz refresh rate, big battery, a Snapdragon 865 chip, 5G, etc. — all exist in the less expensive S20 (starts at $999) and S20+ (starts at $1,199). If you really want a new Galaxy phone, both of these are better buys. Hell, even the Galaxy Note 10 is a better value, especially if you're using it to shoot video.
Update: An earlier version of this story said the Galaxy S20 Ultra's cameras randomly desaturated the colors. We now know the discoloration is the result of the HDR10+ setting being turned on. We've updated the story to clarify this.
https://www.inputmag.com/reviews/samsung-galaxy-s20-ultra-review-camera-comparison-flawed-autofocus
Samsung have reportedly in the last day or so pushed an update to resolve the auto focus issues so we’ll have to see how that fairs now. How and why that wasn’t resolved earlier is...
To me the ultra doesn’t really sound worth it over the regular models.
Be interesting to see S20 ultra v S20/+ not expecting a huge difference though.
Last edited: