**** The Official Samsung Galaxy S22 Family Thread ****

Is that definitely the case though now? I get that monthly security updates that are 200MB odd won't, but Samsung updates have been several hundred MB in recent times as they contain more stuff.

But yeah just disabling has been fine for me for the handful of apps that cannot be uninstalled (the rest can).

Patch coming for the Ultra btw to fix the screen issue:

rKai8i6.png


So what you guys got your camera settings set to -
9:16

3:4

3:4 (108MP)

I have mine set to 9:16 because the other setting put black bars down the side of the pictures.


So what's your setting & why?



You are using the wrong camera setting! Thankfully, across the board on OneUI, Samsung camera core settings are universal on Galaxy flagships.

3:4 (4:3) is the aspect ratio to be using as that uses the full sensor instead of cropping and that is how it should be. You can then crop to 16:9 if you want to later by editing but always capture the full frame view because you can never get back what you otherwise cropped at the first first step anyway and also reduced the resolution by doing so.

Mode: "Photo"
3:4
Flash always off
HDR: Auto (they removed the always On option in OneUI 4)
Scene Optimiser off
Shot suggestions off
High efficiency pictures off
RAW copies off unless you want to keep RAW versions to later edit in a RAW editor
Tracking auto focus off (you lose touch to AF/AE if this is on)
Grid lines on (useful for aligning horizons and stuff when framing a shot)

Mode "Video"
16:9 or Full, there is no 21:9 in this mode
Resolution: 4K 30fps (you cannot switch lenses in 4k 60)
Auto HDR
Video Stabilisation on but only if in normal lighting, if in dim lighting turn it off else you get the Juddery effect when panning as EIS doesn't cope well in low light when panning)
Zoom to mic on (useful)
The rest are the same as photo mode. Anything not mentioned is left off.unless a use case situation comes up like running outdoor so you enable Super Steady mode in video on the main screen.

Mode "Pro Photo"
These will be screenshots as can show it better but:

avOFaPL.png

EV is set to -0.2 so there is a slight drop in overall exposure to capture more dynamic range in highlights. You can always boost shadow areas later as DR is very good on S20 and up.

Focus mode is usually on Multi for me but sometimes I set it on centre depending on subject.

The top right yellow icon is for the tone controls, these are adjusted to the below values to retain a neutral tone but maximise dynamic range again without looking too out of whack.

thK0546.png

Mode "Pro Video"
I manually keep the iso for video at 1600 when indoors or 800 when outdoors. Maintains high quality without introducing noise that iso 3200 can sometimes do in really low light.

Resolution set to 4K 30 again, but aspect ratio this time set to cinematic 21:9 which looks really nice. The mic mode is sometimes changed from omni to front/back depending on the scene and focus changed from multi to something else again, depending on subject matter.

gCSzme4.png

Assuming the setting in camera options is set to remember modes/settings, then these settings will all retain when you next go back to the same mode so you can quickly switch mode and shoot, or tap to change exposure quick etc and shoot.

These are what I use on the S20 5G but the core values will remain the same on S21, S22 etc etc. The other phones will have additional features for tele lenses and stuff but the core settings are what matter most and have yet to let me down and capture a poor image.
 
Last edited:
You'll be sending it back them, 45w charging on Samsung has been there since my Note 10+, it takes some time off but not a lot. It is only really quick in the early stages, so good for a bump but slows significantly like most devices that care about life of the battery be it phones or cars.
You are right. Just watched the video below and it's the final nail in the coffin. Charging being wayyy slowed down just because the phone is being used is something I just can't accept. Feels like a massive downgrade after having OnePlus phones for the last few years that don't do that. Will be cancelling my order in the morning.

 
0 -50% in roughly 20 minutes, full charge in an hour. I don't know what more people want.

I'm sure if Samsung could do it quicker they would.
In the end its a trade off between battery longevity and saftey. If they go faster they have to deal with complaints after a few months or years.

Just out of curiosity what would be acceptable?
 
Is that definitely the case though now? I get that monthly security updates that are 200MB odd won't, but Samsung updates have been several hundred MB in recent times as they contain more stuff.

But yeah just disabling has been fine for me for the handful of apps that cannot be uninstalled (the rest can).

Patch coming for the Ultra btw to fix the screen issue:

rKai8i6.png






You are using the wrong camera setting! Thankfully, across the board on OneUI, Samsung camera core settings are universal on Galaxy flagships.

3:4 (4:3) is the aspect ratio to be using as that uses the full sensor instead of cropping and that is how it should be. You can then crop to 16:9 if you want to later by editing but always capture the full frame view because you can never get back what you otherwise cropped at the first first step anyway and also reduced the resolution by doing so.

Mode: "Photo"
3:4
Flash always off
HDR: Auto (they removed the always On option in OneUI 4)
Scene Optimiser off
Shot suggestions off
High efficiency pictures off
RAW copies off unless you want to keep RAW versions to later edit in a RAW editor
Tracking auto focus off (you lose touch to AF/AE if this is on)
Grid lines on (useful for aligning horizons and stuff when framing a shot)

Mode "Video"
16:9 or Full, there is no 21:9 in this mode
Resolution: 4K 30fps (you cannot switch lenses in 4k 60)
Auto HDR
Video Stabilisation on but only if in normal lighting, if in dim lighting turn it off else you get the Juddery effect when panning as EIS doesn't cope well in low light when panning)
Zoom to mic on (useful)
The rest are the same as photo mode. Anything not mentioned is left off.unless a use case situation comes up like running outdoor so you enable Super Steady mode in video on the main screen.

Mode "Pro Photo"
These will be screenshots as can show it better but:

avOFaPL.png

EV is set to -0.2 so there is a slight drop in overall exposure to capture more dynamic range in highlights. You can always boost shadow areas later as DR is very good on S20 and up.

Focus mode is usually on Multi for me but sometimes I set it on centre depending on subject.

The top right yellow icon is for the tone controls, these are adjusted to the below values to retain a neutral tone but maximise dynamic range again without looking too out of whack.

thK0546.png

Mode "Pro Video"
I manually keep the iso for video at 1600 when indoors or 800 when outdoors. Maintains high quality without introducing noise that iso 3200 can sometimes do in really low light.

Resolution set to 4K 30 again, but aspect ratio this time set to cinematic 21:9 which looks really nice. The mic mode is sometimes changed from omni to front/back depending on the scene and focus changed from multi to something else again, depending on subject matter.

gCSzme4.png

Assuming the setting in camera options is set to remember modes/settings, then these settings will all retain when you next go back to the same mode so you can quickly switch mode and shoot, or tap to change exposure quick etc and shoot.

These are what I use on the S20 5G but the core values will remain the same on S21, S22 etc etc. The other phones will have additional features for tele lenses and stuff but the core settings are what matter most and have yet to let me down and capture a poor image.

Thanks for that.

But what about those huge black bars at either side of the picture when taken at 4:3?
 
Thanks for that.

But what about those huge black bars at either side of the picture when taken at 4:3?


There aren't any huge black bars in 3:4/4:3 :p That is just in the camera app window because that is the aspect ratio. When you actually view the captured photo, the image is without any bars. Want to fill the screen? pinch to zoom in. You have an image that has made full use of the sensor and you have captured the full FOV available as a result.

0 -50% in roughly 20 minutes, full charge in an hour. I don't know what more people want.

I'm sure if Samsung could do it quicker they would.
In the end its a trade off between battery longevity and saftey. If they go faster they have to deal with complaints after a few months or years.

Just out of curiosity what would be acceptable?

Full charge in 30 mins :p

There are many ways round the battery longevity issue that other makers have tackled for a ouple years now. Chinese flagships use dual battery cells that are charged individually so are able to charge faster and with less heat than a big solo cell, also the use of a GaN charger that is PPS means there is less heat generated at the source and the current/voltage is constantly adjusted rather than just fly through various preset values at whatever range as per standard Quick Charge methods.

For comparison a 4500mAh battery on this nubia phone charges to 50% in about 10 minutes or less.

I agree though, 0-50% in 20 mins is quick, but it is only quick in that half of the cycle, after 50% things get slower and it can be argued that the latter half of a charge cycle is what people want to be the quickest as this is often the top up range since you do not want your battery to always be sitting in the lower half as that is not healthy for those cells.

For me it's a non issue though. I have a wireless charger on the desk so the phone is always topped up, QC3.0 in the car so that is covered too when out and about and have a mini power bank when out on the field so at least get a 75% charge back.
 
Last edited:
There aren't any huge black bars in 3:4/4:3 :p That is just in the camera app window because that is the aspect ratio. When you actually view the captured photo, the image is without any bars. Want to fill the screen? pinch to zoom in. You have an image that has made full use of the sensor and you have captured the full FOV available as a result.


When I look at photos in Google pictures on a PC monitor that have been taken in 4:3 they have black bars either side.
 
Can you show a screenshot or picture of the screen etc? As that is 100% not normal and indicates something is afoot so would need to see what you are seeing first to determine.
 
That is normal, there are no bars which means when you open the photo on your phone or monitor on PC it will show pillarboxes which is also normal. You have a photo that has the maximum fov there so you simply pinch to zoom in to fill the whole screen (or zoom on the PC) - The view you then get is without the pillarboxes but notice that the whole image is cropped in and you lose a chunk of fov? That's why taking photos in 3:4/4:3 is the best option as you are getting the highest quality image without a crop of the sensor.

If you aren't really bothered about having bits cropped off and losing fov as a result, then you can select a wider aspect ratio like full/16:9 etc but as mentioned, you are losing out by doing that both for resolution and for actual stuff captured in the frame.
 
That is normal, there are no bars which means when you open the photo on your phone or monitor on PC it will show pillarboxes which is also normal. You have a photo that has the maximum fov there so you simply pinch to zoom in to fill the whole screen (or zoom on the PC) - The view you then get is without the pillarboxes but notice that the whole image is cropped in and you lose a chunk of fov? That's why taking photos in 3:4/4:3 is the best option as you are getting the highest quality image without a crop of the sensor.

If you aren't really bothered about having bits cropped off and losing fov as a result, then you can select a wider aspect ratio like full/16:9 etc but as mentioned, you are losing out by doing that both for resolution and for actual stuff captured in the frame.


Thank you for the explanation. Most helpful
 
More logical than interesting tbf, he says for his usage the vibration motor axis works better for him because the S21 flat on a desk vibrates more audibly than the S22, even though the haptics in the hand are very good between them both.

OneUI 4.1 features are also gonna be on the S21 Ultra and the cameras are very similar too (though not the same) - So really anyone with an S21 Ultra shouldn't upgrade to S22 Ultra which is his take on it and that makes perfect sense especially with his closing words :cool:

I can see the dust around the camera lenses being the main and maybe the only gripe for me as that looks annoying since I don't really like using cases. I might actually install a dbrand Swarm skin as a result but then the Graphite colour is hidden away.... Although with graphite the dust would be less visible and maybe even less evident as the finish might be a bit different? Will have to see.
 
Just out of curiosity what would be acceptable?
The 65W I currently get with my OP 8T. May sound silly but this charging speed has literally changed my life, so I just can't see myself going back to anything slower, ever. I'm a very heavy user, hours of video calls daily, gaming, streaming, maps/GPS etc so being able to charge fast is at the top of my priorities in a phone. Was hoping the bump to 45W would be good enough but seems not, so I'll have to pass on this phone.
 
More logical than interesting tbf, he says for his usage the vibration motor axis works better for him because the S21 flat on a desk vibrates more audibly than the S22, even though the haptics in the hand are very good between them both.

OneUI 4.1 features are also gonna be on the S21 Ultra and the cameras are very similar too (though not the same) - So really anyone with an S21 Ultra shouldn't upgrade to S22 Ultra which is his take on it and that makes perfect sense especially with his closing words :cool:

I can see the dust around the camera lenses being the main and maybe the only gripe for me as that looks annoying since I don't really like using cases. I might actually install a dbrand Swarm skin as a result but then the Graphite colour is hidden away.... Although with graphite the dust would be less visible and maybe even less evident as the finish might be a bit different? Will have to see.

I think it's fair to say the s22U is better with a case. For caseless they would have been better making the whole phone the same depth as the cameras and making the battery bigger or something! but i guess it works quite well that you can get a decent protective case without making the phone any thicker by using the "depth" of the cameras for the main bit of the phone...
 
It's not even that much faster than the Samsung
The 65W I currently get with my OP 8T. May sound silly but this charging speed has literally changed my life, so I just can't see myself going back to anything slower, ever. I'm a very heavy user, hours of video calls daily, gaming, streaming, maps/GPS etc so being able to charge fast is at the top of my priorities in a phone. Was hoping the bump to 45W would be good enough but seems not, so I'll have to pass on this phone.

Seems extreme, it's not like car charging where the difference between fast and slow is a day, its like 20mins.

Do you really deplete your phone enough that more than an 20mins extra charge bump wouldn't be sufficient to keep you going, you'd surely have to be fully depleting your phone a couple of times per day for the extra time makes a noticeable difference in your life baring in mind one device has a larger battery in the first place
 
Back
Top Bottom