Richest man in the Worlds company "can't" [won't] fund Starlink anymore because it's cost them nearly $100 million
That's 0.046% of his supposed net worth.
What a great man...I'm sure it's not him being completely petty when they told him to **** off.
I'm sure it isn't too given the request pre-dates that, unless you believe there is a SpaceX time machine?
He gave 5.7 billion to charity last year and he pledged to donate at least half of his total net worth a decade ago.
That 0.046% is roughly like £80 if using the UK median net worth for an individual (£172k), the 5.7 billion donation last year is like an ordinary/average person in the UK donating £4000 (assuming a net worth of say 210 billion for Elon).
Did you donate £4000 to charity last year Vincent?
His pledge in 2012 is currently equivalent to an average person in the UK pledging to donate >£86,000. Most people don't pledge to donate at least half their net worth to charity.
I'm not sure it is directly funded by him though rather than SpaceX (of which he owns just under 50%), it's not really something a private company should need to be on the hook for on an ongoing basis though and there are other (non-billionaire) shareholders + a larger mission for that company. After he made bank with PayPal, his main ventures all have the intention of some greater goal for humanity, he could have happily retired and lived a very sweet life after that, it's not like his personal lifestyle at the moment is likely significantly different as the richest man in the world vs if he'd stayed as a less famous centimillionaire. In fact, if he'd retired after PayPal he'd quite plausibly still be in the low billions billionaire from just passively investing, maybe backing some tech ventures but not actually taking an exec role etc. he'd still be able to buy mansions, fly in private jets etc. but various cool things probably wouldn't exist, including the Starlink service Ukraine is heavily dependent on.
Last edited: