The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down

Status
Not open for further replies.
Ahh interesting. The daft thing is if he made the decision to ban WFH and increase the working hours, then he probably wouldn't have needed to pay out so much in redundancies.
Assuming your aim was to trim every ounce of fat off and only keep the choice parts, you'd have to start with redundancies to ensure you seperate the wheat from the chaff, i.e. on your terms.

The next step of a blind ultimatum about Twitter 2.0 just makes it a crapshoot, right from mass walkouts, to only leaving the chaff behind..
 
The best part is that even if Elon has his dream of Twitter going back to being an engineering company, at some point reality will set in and he'll have to add back all the other departments like legal and content moderation. They were there for a reason and given enough time Twitter's staff numbers will have to go full circle.
 
Last edited:
Yes, although it had expanded its workforce pretty rapidly in the last few years.

From doing a search 7500 still quite a big number required to run Twitter. Didnt half the folk leave already so that leaves roughly 3750 and now reports 75% of that could walk which leave around 12% of the original total = 937. That would be some severance pay with 3 months each and all the cash already spent to buy off the board and company. Its a massive amount of money plus he would need to rehire which will take more time and money.
 
Last edited:
With 7500 direct employees and ~6000 contractors that means with revenue of 5billion you are looking at $370,370 per employee. Considering that many of these will be low paid contractors for moderation and support roles and the platform cost of delivering the service beyond payroll costs was unlikely to be more than 10% of revenue that's pretty healthy. There's certainly room to optimise but it's not grossly over staffed by any means for the scale and complexity of the operation considering it is a global service with hundreds of jurisdictions and languages, millions of users and a wide array of advertising clients to support. The sales team alone to drive advertising revenue was likely 1000 of that headcount.
 
Was listening to https://twitter.com/Popehat Podcast Serious Trouble earlier and he was talking about Musk appearing in Delaware Chancery Court this week, funnily enough in front of the same judge that was hearing the Twitter case but this case is Tesla shareholders suing because they feel his compensation fee back in 2017 of $54b was way over the top and he was the one making the decision and not the board.

The SEC case and the consent agreement was bought up by plaintiffs lawyers, Musk actually told the federal judge that the consent agreement was "not valid" as it was "made under duress" :cry: So because he didn't want to have the consent agreement but agreed to it because the SEC made a deal with him its not valid. That would mean that any plea agreement made with a defendant could be said to be not valid later by that defendant when they didn't abide by its terms as it was "made under duress". He is telling the judge that he didn't run his Tesla tweets past the board as the consent agreement said he had to. Confessing to breaking an agreement on the stand probably isn't the way to go.

If the plaintiffs can prove it was Musk and not the board (Musk said he played no part in the decision to award him $54b) that awarded the pay and they have produced documents to show he did take part in the decision, then he could be on the hook for having to pay a good chunk back.

 
Excuse me? Where are you from? Everywhere would consider that to be the case...

I think in a weird way you're both agreeing with each other.

What I do know is that in the US the public take a very strict stance to the sexual treatment of "minors".

Having sex with an 18 year old: absolutely fine, they're an adult!
Having sex with someone who's 17.5: you pedo!!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom