Soldato
- Joined
- 12 Feb 2006
- Posts
- 17,412
- Location
- Surrey
They do it against the rules? First I've heard of this.How come you've never said a word when Google does it?
They do it against the rules? First I've heard of this.How come you've never said a word when Google does it?
No as buildings regulations are for permanent structures not tents
Unless your trying to make some whataboutism point that a city should not enforce certain rules because it has a homeless problem
So it is exactly whataboutism.It's not really a whataboutism, it's more like, having people sleep in an office is magnitudes less severe an issue than the pandemic of drug fueled homelessness currently affecting that city, so maybe direct your resources in that direction.
but they are entirely different problems and a lot of money is spent on the homeless..The fact is providing an actual home in a shelter is insufficient to solve homelessness because the homeless don't want to be there, however much you spend on therapy to help convince them it is for their best.It's not really a whataboutism, it's more like, having people sleep in an office is magnitudes less severe an issue than the pandemic of drug fueled homelessness currently affecting that city, so maybe direct your resources in that direction.
Right-wingers: Screw the homeless! If you're poor then it's your fault. Personal responsibility FTW!!
* Someone inspects Daddy Elon's HQ to see if meets regulations *
Right-wingers: How dare they!! Don't they know there are homeless people around?
lol
People are living on the streets in tents, is the city enforcing the rules on those people as fervently?
Twitter Files 3.0 was another nothing burger. Meanwhile, Musk is still practicing the old ways...
but they are entirely different problems and a lot of money is spent on the homeless..
San Francisco’s homelessness department is pushing to continue an expensive tent encampment program that it says is crucial for keeping people off the sidewalks, despite its high price tag of more than $60,000 per tent, per year.
Exploiting workers due to financial or legal problems is much more serious
Do you remember when roar excused the reason why Elon hasn't released the negative republican stuff by saying "give him time" lol.He really is loving conversing with these MAGA loons. A CT who was pushing for Trump to invoke the Insurrection Act in the lead up to Jan 6th. Its not like he is more dangerous to the US Constitution than some account throttling on Twitter is it... oh wait..
maybe there isnt anyDo you remember when roar excused the reason why Elon hasn't released the negative republican stuff by saying "give him time" lol.
Elon is an idiot and running Twitter into the ground.
It's going to stop working any day now, don't worry. yessir, any day now.Yes, the media coverage is certainly making it look like that. Mean while Twitter is more active than ever.
I just thought of an even better one.
Elon spends 44 billion on a social media site
Right wingers "genius move. Elon will save us all"
There's literally people dying of hunger in the world that could have been saved if the richest man in the world had donated even just 10 billion of his 250 billion wealth.
Right wingers "not Elon's problem. You can't expect him to help others. He has his own life to sort out. Why should have even pay more tax. It's unfair on Elon."
Lol
As Elton would say "another bites the dust"
Like a road that gets more busy looking at a car crash though.Yes, the media coverage is certainly making it look like that. Mean while Twitter is more active than ever.