Soldato
He's not just someone that "doesn't care about Musk", he's someone that thinks we shouldn't be posting in here.For someone that doesnt care about Musk you sure do post a lot in his defence.
He's not just someone that "doesn't care about Musk", he's someone that thinks we shouldn't be posting in here.For someone that doesnt care about Musk you sure do post a lot in his defence.
They can hardly just block those individual accounts as that's not how it works.
They can block them by username or by ip address, however we know this won’t happen.
They also block via mobile number, which is required after a few days to continue posting.
And also makes a lot of sense given the line of work they're in. Click bait to froth up the left.I'm pretty sure the scope of that is federal?
He's not just someone that "doesn't care about Musk", he's someone that thinks we shouldn't be posting in here.
Yeah but just grab a sim from your local supermarket and stick in your phone, get the text, and then swap it back. Easy to circumvent.That's interesting, never knew this.![]()
Yeah but just grab a sim from your local supermarket and stick in your phone, get the text, and then swap it back. Easy to circumvent.
I'm pretty sure the scope of that is federal?
And also makes a lot of sense given the line of work they're in. Click bait to froth up the left.
It looks like twitter is having fun again.
Apparently people are going from normal to suspended to normal with refreshes, getting "your account has been suspended" emails without being suspended, are being told they've got no followers/aren't following anyone, and tweets with certain types of images seem to be breaking the ability for them to post (if they try and post an image with a gif for example it stops the tweet going though, and later ones going through until it's removed).
Was today the day Musk was going to "free up" a load of "dormant" account names, or is he just unplugging stuff at random again?![]()
If they're launching from Cape Canaveral then I don't see how Florida is even relevant, it's USAF land.State.
Ironically, it's frothing up the right as much as anyone else.
'Looking into it.'
They also launch from texas. That's where the testing site is.If they're launching from Cape Canaveral then I don't see how Florida is even relevant, it's USAF land.
If they're launching from Cape Canaveral then I don't see how Florida is even relevant, it's USAF land.
The Spaceflight Entity Liability Bill expands legal immunities that will shield private space companies, like Musk’s SpaceX and Jeff Bezos’s Blue Origin, from legal responsibility when workers suffer injuries or even die. At its core, the bill broadens when these companies are exempted “from liability for injury to or death of a crew resulting from spaceflight activities.”
And Musk made sure his presence was known throughout the process of the bill. While the bill was advancing through both the state House and Senate, a SpaceX lobbyist, Jeffrey Sharkey, appeared at practically every single committee meeting related to it—lobbying members on at least five separate occasions, in five different state House committees.
Other lobbyists from Boeing, Space Florida, and Florida Rising also made their presence known—but not to the extent SpaceX did.
..The bill mandates “crew” and participants alike fill out a waiver that grants legal immunities to space companies in cases of injury or death.
Moreover, the bill expands the definition of “spaceflight entity” to include any entity authorized to conduct spaceflight activities, beyond ones solely associated with the United States Federal Aviation Administration, opening up which entities in the broader industry will qualify for the expanded immunity.
The bill also cuts out language ascribing liability to spaceflight entities for damage caused from “inherent risks” of spaceflight activity; instead, the bill broadens the scope of liability immunity to include all spaceflight activities.
Finally, the bill also amends language that orders entities to be liable for injury if they had actual knowledge, or reasonably should have known, of risks. The new language only orders legal liability for “actual knowledge” of risks, meaning there is no longer any expectation for companies to be responsible for damages from risks they “reasonably should have known” about.
It certainly sounds like the twitter spaces farce was worth it for Musk, given DeSantos has basically said "lol safety" and as long as Musk doesn't have it written down anywhere that Space X knew of a risk he's fine no matter how many people get killed he's going to be fine.
On the flip side at least for now Musk will still have to abide by FAA rules in regards to safety, and they can still ground him regardless of where in the US he tries to fly a death trap from.
It's basically qualified immunity for anything to do with space related activities, including if i'm reading that right those on the ground in the likes of manufacturing where there is no "inherent" risk beyond what is normal in any heavy industry, so someone gets killed on the factory floor and he's relatively safe. No wonder it appeals to him given what was apparently going on at the Tesla plants in California etc.
The immunity from liability granted to the spaceflight entity by a participant signing such a waiver does not apply if the spaceflight entity:
- Commits an act or omission that constitutes gross negligence or willful or wanton disregard for the safety of the participant which proximately causes the injury or death of the participant;
- Has actual knowledge or reasonably should have known of a dangerous condition on the land or in the facilities or equipment used in the spaceflight activities which proximately causes the injury or death of the participant; or
- Intentionally injures the participant.