The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stage 5 - DM the hive to get in on the act for back up
Such paranoia from some in this thread. Roar said the same the other day.

You think we wouldn't all laugh at the obvious funny posts on our own and other members have to DM everyone to get us to laugh other wise their own point wouldn't have any value? Jeesh get over yourself guys. Your posts are just that laughable.

Mods ban everyone on all sides and rightly so. It's just one side is such a broflake about it that they cry in another thread. I've been banned plenty times from this thread and each time the mods are right to do so. Enjoy the holiday and go do something else. Or don't. Just don't cry about it in another thread.
 
Now the Elon/Disney lawsuit makes sense. Disney have stopped advertising on twitter and this is how Elon reacts. What a baby

k6ND8xE.jpeg



an2f2L7.png
 
Last edited:
Pssst, that's how it works here. Don't dare post an opinion that goes against the hive. Well, when i say hive, i mean the dozen or so lost souls:cry:

Once you poke the edges of their belief system, they activate their defense mechanism.

Stage 1 - Mob reply's
Stage 2 - Demand peer reviewed analysis of every word you posted
Stage 3 - Launch the laughing emoji cannons
Stage 4 - Continue with the re quote reply's to keep you busy
Stage 5 - DM the hive to get in on the act for back up
Stage 6 - Resort to mockery
Stage 7 - Repeat points 1 - 6 until you can't be bovvered.

Pssst, wee secret for you, these dozen or so "real people" are Godless, soulless, cretins that couldn't exist if the MSM wasn't here to tell them how to think.
Would be handy to have some sort of way to drive them back to speakers corner. Like a crucifix or garlic does for vampires. :)
 
Citation needed.
Weird, but if you insist:

 
No wait, its cool right I get shut down for debating the other side here.

Got it
Maybe it's not that you got shutdown for debating the other side but for the way in which you did it.

I mean IDK as I've not got the first clue what you're so salty about but generally speaking I've only seen the mods shutdown (normally after a warning) debates when someone can't keep a civil tongue in their head or is going way OT.
Some people agreeing they don't think MAGA people are evil, while at the same time think it's reasonable for banks to shut down peoples accounts for "wrong think". Don't kill them, just cut off there financial life line.
Or maybe it's just that some people like the idea of living in a free society where people can choose who they associate with and say what they want (within reason), where people are free to call others evil if they want and companies can choose whether they do business with someone.
 
Last edited:
the comparison she made was utterly wrong and disrespectful to millions of jews murdered during a terrible period in history.

but that fact that she likened that to the Jewish holocaust is utterly insulting.

Yeap, I absolute 100% agree with both of you, her comparison between the holocaust and "hating someone for their political beliefs" was absolutely and utterly wrong and at no point have I ever said anything different. The only single point I did make, which both of you managed to ignore I noticed, is that ICDP said multiple times that Carano's tweet compared "being Republican" to the Holocaust and in reality she never, ever said that no matter what "assumptions" people make.

To be very clear, I made absolutely NO other point about what ICDP said other than pointing out that lie and I didn't agree or disagree with anything else they mentioned about the story, just the part they made-up.
 
multiple times that Carano's tweet compared "being Republican" to the Holocaust and in reality she never, ever said that no matter what "assumptions" people make
I'm fairly sure he did reply to that, but none the less, it's pretty obvious she is comparing being republican because of her posting history... To be clear, you don't think she was talking about that as her own experience as a republican? You think she was talking about what, biden's experience as a Dem? Seemed like she was taking about in her own view, and her being a republican gave her view. Just she left out the word republican as it's not needed.

If Elon tweets "running a social media site is hard", you're not going to argue that Elon is talking about mark Zuckerberg and his struggles to make Facebook successful are you?
 
Yeap, I absolute 100% agree with both of you, her comparison between the holocaust and "hating someone for their political beliefs" was absolutely and utterly wrong and at no point have I ever said anything different. The only single point I did make, which both of you managed to ignore I noticed, is that ICDP said multiple times that Carano's tweet compared "being Republican" to the Holocaust and in reality she never, ever said that no matter what "assumptions" people make.

To be very clear, I made absolutely NO other point about what ICDP said other than pointing out that lie and I didn't agree or disagree with anything else they mentioned about the story, just the part they made-up.

Your problem is, my point wasn’t a lie because reading the backstory of why she made that tweet, you find she was reacting to the many star wars fans who had repeatedly campaigned for her to be sacked for her previous pro republican right wing views. She stated the election was stolen, posted support for the republican party and for Trump and also posted her transphobic views many times (none of which got her sacked). So at no level can it be debated that her subsequent offensive post (that did get her sacked), was referring to anything but her own perceived sense of persecution for her very right wing views.

In short, she is a very right wing republican supporter who was comparing people being mean to her on social media, to the persecution of the Jews in 1930s and 1940s Germany. So it’s not a leap to conclude she wasn’t worried that lefty liberals were suffering persecution.
 
Last edited:
Is campaigning for someone to be sacked from their job "being mean" to them on social media? Like if someone were to do that to any of us, we'd probably feel extremely angry since it's our livlihood. I'd say it's rather egregious actually.
 
Last edited:
Is campaigning for someone to be sacked from their job "being mean" to them on social media? Like if someone were to do that to any of us, we'd probably feel extremely angry since it's our livlihood. I'd say it's rather egregious actually.
Hmm.

Should that Sky news reporter be fired for comparing the situation in Gaza to the holocaust or would that be persecution?
 
Last edited:
Now the Elon/Disney lawsuit makes sense. Disney have stopped advertising on twitter and this is how Elon reacts. What a baby

k6ND8xE.jpeg



an2f2L7.png




Musk hasn't just lost a $100 billion, but he did it on speedrun losing half a billion on average every day in the last year


And it's only a matter of time till he gets done for fraud

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom