The RAC have lost my car.

Nothing conclusive on the dash cam. Just them moving it around on the starter motor. They do appear to have left it in a lay-by at some point though.
I have no proof of the rear window beyond the tape, the tiny piece of glass, and the lack of a dealer sticker. Nothing that would hold up.

Oh, more evidence: There is no sweep marks on the rear window from the rear wiper. I'd sure expect there to be on a 15-year-old car. Also, it's perfectly clean whereas the rest of the back of the car is utterly filthy.
 
Last edited:
OK, so I posted this picture on Show Us Your Motors a few weeks ago to bring the thread back to normality. Notice the dealer sticker on the left? Notice I-VTEC under the wiper?

pluO6B7.jpg

Let's zoom and enhance:

M3dKE40.png

Neither of those things are there now. Here's the rear right now. Hard to see as it's dark:

CB3s9un.jpg
 
So the rear window has clearly been smashed and replaced... crazy.

What brand is the new rear window glass? I wonder if it matches the side windows. May not have originally but would be interesting to know.
I'll check in the morning.
What can you actually claim for here or get compensated for beyond the cost of a hire car?
I don't want anything beyond that. What I do want though is an apology and an admission that they screwed up. I want everyone to know what a shady company they are.
 
I mean I wouldn't want to own that car anymore. I don't buy new cars so new is always just new to me. I'd expect RAC to be covering the cost of me being back in my starting position - which was having a vehicle I knew the record of. But seeing as RAC can't be trusted it'd probably have to be brand new to be sure it wasn't just someone else's crack den vehicle they'd switcheroo'd.

Yeah, that's not going to happen. Technically I am in the position I started in. I have a rear window. If they had delivered it back without one then that would be a different matter entirely.
 
Yup. If they'd just been open and honest from the start, it wouldn't have even been an issue. The car was damaged in transit, these things happen. Stringing the customer along for 2 weeks and just pretending you known nothing is worse than just holding your hands up and admitting what happened.
This is entirely my point. There was absolutely no need for any of this. Things happen, things get lost, but it's how you deal with it that matters. RAC have shown that they are not only downright dishonest, they also don't give a stuff about their customers.
 
Guardian contacted RAC which set a fire under them. I've had contact from their chief engineer who is making things right. I'll update when I know more but it looks like I won't be out of pocket.
It's looking like RAC didn't know the screen was being replaced. I think the 3rd-party contractor did it and thought they could cover it up. Doesn't excuse no one talking to me though.
 
Last edited:
Where we're at right now:

Smart repair booked to fix the damage to the paint on the tailgate where the glass was replaced (or when it was smashed)
Agreement in principle that they will cover my hire-car costs once I get the invoice from my insurer

That is it so far. It's moving in the right direction and I've had contact with several people who are very high-up in the organisation.
 
Back
Top Bottom