• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The Radeon RX 6900/6950 XT Owners Thread.

Looks very nice mate, congrats!

Curious to know what clock speed/voltage settings you run with the 293W default power limit at +15%?
Been playing Guardians of the galaxy since it hit game pass at these settings:
ZH25zSt.png
Update, these are better. Had a boot out to desktop after 2h+ with the higher clocks.
KOObqME.png
 
Last edited:
Been playing Guardians of the galaxy since it hit game pass at these settings:
ZH25zSt.png
Update, these are better. Had a boot out to desktop after 2h+ with the higher clocks.
KOObqME.png
I was going to say, find it hard to believe the first set were stable. :D

Have you verified that the GPU voltage used is actually changing from 1.175v to 1.075v? Because typically once you go over 2600Mhz max core clock, reducing the voltage slider (which applies a offset to the voltage-frequency curve) does nothing.

I find (with several XTXH) that if I use 2600Mhz or higher, then I need to reduce the voltage using MPT to see actual verified voltage levels (monitored via HWINFO64 voltage value) reduce from the default 1.2v. If I use 2599Mhz or lower, voltage reductions using the slider in RS works as expected.
 
Been playing Guardians of the galaxy since it hit game pass at these settings:

Just for info I find that Global sometimes 'loses' the settings, but if you create a game profile it stays as it should :)

These are my 'safe' ones atm for TD2, been having some issues with it but not with other games (think I need a full wipe, waiting for the new AMD drivers to drop). Have MPT set to 347W and 2200 Fclk those are the only changes;

image.png
 
Just for info I find that Global sometimes 'loses' the settings, but if you create a game profile it stays as it should :)

These are my 'safe' ones atm for TD2, been having some issues with it but not with other games (think I need a full wipe, waiting for the new AMD drivers to drop). Have MPT set to 347W and 2200 Fclk those are the only changes;

image.png
I recognise those power limit and FCLK settings. :D:cool:
 
I was going to say, find it hard to believe the first set were stable. :D

Have you verified that the GPU voltage used is actually changing from 1.175v to 1.075v? Because typically once you go over 2600Mhz max core clock, reducing the voltage slider (which applies a offset to the voltage-frequency curve) does nothing.

I find (with several XTXH) that if I use 2600Mhz or higher, then I need to reduce the voltage using MPT to see actual verified voltage levels (monitored via HWINFO64 voltage value) reduce from the default 1.2v. If I use 2599Mhz or lower, voltage reductions using the slider in RS works as expected.
Just run a TS extreme @ 2550/2650, 1075mv set. According to Hwinfo 1048mv (VDDCR_GPU), 1054mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952552
With 2499/2599, 1075mv set. 1019mv(VDDCR_GPU), 1061mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952714
With 2499/2599, 1060mv set. 1014mv(VDDCR_GPU), 1062mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952860 (winner)
With 2550/2650, 1060mv set. 1024mv(VDDCR_GPU), 1061mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952957
With 2499/2599, 1175mv set. 1091mv(VDDCR_GPU), 0844mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26953054 (fell off a cliff)
With 2499/2599, 1040mv set. Driver crash.
I've seen the behavior of the voltage doing what it likes in the past, like you said beyond a certain point the card just pulls what it needs. It seems to of changed in behavior from older drivers as I'd looked into this before and seen the higher voltages been reported in HWinfo. Looks like my settings are the sweet spot for a 293w power limit on water.
 
Just run a TS extreme @ 2550/2650, 1075mv set. According to Hwinfo 1048mv (VDDCR_GPU), 1054mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952552
With 2499/2599, 1075mv set. 1019mv(VDDCR_GPU), 1061mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952714
With 2499/2599, 1060mv set. 1014mv(VDDCR_GPU), 1062mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952860 (winner)
With 2550/2650, 1060mv set. 1024mv(VDDCR_GPU), 1061mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26952957
With 2499/2599, 1175mv set. 1091mv(VDDCR_GPU), 0844mv (VDDCR_SOC) was the peak. https://www.3dmark.com/spy/26953054 (fell off a cliff)
With 2499/2599, 1040mv set. Driver crash.
I've seen the behavior of the voltage doing what it likes in the past, like you said beyond a certain point the card just pulls what it needs. It seems to of changed in behavior from older drivers as I'd looked into this before and seen the higher voltages been reported in HWinfo. Looks like my settings are the sweet spot for a 293w power limit on water.
Good testing. Those temps will definitely help keep the power draw a bit lower too.
 
@Duckwave did you ever get your Warzone issues in Caldera sorted with the 6900XT? I just picked one up at the weekend and having similar problems I think, nice high FPS the majority of the time 180+ but jarring drops to 130-140 when traversing the map or entering more busy areas. I'm paired with a 5900x and 32GB 3800 C16 DDR4, 1440p mostly low/competitive settings.
 
@Duckwave did you ever get your Warzone issues in Caldera sorted with the 6900XT? I just picked one up at the weekend and having similar problems I think, nice high FPS the majority of the time 180+ but jarring drops to 130-140 when traversing the map or entering more busy areas. I'm paired with a 5900x and 32GB 3800 C16 DDR4, 1440p mostly low/competitive settings.
Here's how it runs for me at 1440P low settings on a 5950X+6900 XT.
Have you got Smart Access Memory enabled? It can help quite nicely in this game.
 
Back
Top Bottom