Associate
How are the VRAM temps?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Radeon RX 7900 XT(X) Owners Thread.
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
Associate
Definitely not normal. Have you checked parameters using HWINFO?
like vram temps are ever 1st point of concern ..
which parameters should i check?
Isn't that game super demanding? And it has a ton of detail and graphics options.
I thought people were running it with DLSS /upscaling to get good framerates at higher resolutions?
There's some 2021 GPUs struggling to play at 1080p Ultra here:
From here:
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pag..._graphics_performance_benchmark_review,6.html
I'd guess that 1080p Ultra ought to be possible on a RX 7900 XT for this title. Upscaling should allow higher resolutions.
The GPU utilisation can still reach 100% even at 1080p (60 FPS), just because of the amount of graphical details that are loaded on Ultra. The game engine can load a ton of detail over long distances.
Try DX11 and DX12 to see how it affects performance.
I thought people were running it with DLSS /upscaling to get good framerates at higher resolutions?
There's some 2021 GPUs struggling to play at 1080p Ultra here:
From here:
https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pag..._graphics_performance_benchmark_review,6.html
I'd guess that 1080p Ultra ought to be possible on a RX 7900 XT for this title. Upscaling should allow higher resolutions.
The GPU utilisation can still reach 100% even at 1080p (60 FPS), just because of the amount of graphical details that are loaded on Ultra. The game engine can load a ton of detail over long distances.
Try DX11 and DX12 to see how it affects performance.
Last edited:
New WHQL AMD software/ drivers here:
better late than never.
Can't comment on the VR driver improvements, myself.
better late than never.
Can't comment on the VR driver improvements, myself.
Last edited:
I seem to remember that this game loves CPUs with lots of cache like 5800x3d and the 7800x3d
They discuss it in the video below. The 7800X3D is getting 1% lows of >60 FPS, but the 13900K is struggling. Some interesting results, and fairly consistent across resolutions.
youtu.be
What CPU for Flight Sim? | 13900K vs R7 7800 X3D | Performance tested in MSFS
Looking to upgrade? What CPU, available in the market right now, offers best performance in flight simulation. Intel 13900K tested against AMD 7800 X3D in Mi...
youtu.be
Last edited:
Caporegime
The 23.7.1 release notes have a fixed issue listed for VR:
Fixed Issues
Certain virtual reality games or applications may encounter suboptimal performance or occasional stuttering on Radeon™ RX 7000 series GPUs.
The driver can be downloaded here: https://www.amd.com/en/support/kb/release-notes/rn-rad-win-23-7-1
"New driver, new table.
Same story, ddu previous driver, uninstall chipset driver. Install new driver, install chipset driver, run benches."
Same story, ddu previous driver, uninstall chipset driver. Install new driver, install chipset driver, run benches."
| Driver | FireStrike | FS Extreme | FS Ultra | TimeSpy | TS Extreme | Speed Way | Port Royal |
| 4080 Trinity OC + 528.29 W10 Pro SR | 68609 | 34777 | 17694 | 28372 | 14147 | 7237 | 17804 |
| 7900 XTX Red Devil + 23.2.2 W10 Pro SR | 80771 | 39176 | 19973 | 29118 | 14677 | 6063 | 15850 |
| 7900 XTX Nitro+ 23.2.2 W10 Pro SR | 80956 | 40863 | 20865 | 30339 | 15073 | 6153 | 16379 |
| Nitro+ 23.3.1 W10 Pro SR | 80713 | 40615 | 20728 | 30467 | 15067 | 6268 | 16331 |
| Nitro+ 23.3.2 W10 Pro SR | 81003 | 40982 | 20934 | 30727 | 15188 | 6278 | 16551 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.1 W10 Pro SR | 80999 | 41028 | 20909 | 30639 | 15142 | 6276 | 16560 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.2 W10 Pro SR | 81441 | 41213 | 21038 | 30691 | 15226 | 6468 | 16779 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.2 W10 Pro - New Ram 1 SR | 82412 | 41637 | 21150 | 30759 | 15280 | 6499 | 16880 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.2 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 82967 | 41686 | 21150 | 30934 | 15328 | 6483 | 16844 |
| Nitro+ 23.4.3 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR / Round 2 | 82674 | 41639 | 21096 | 30964 | 15325 | 6477 | 16784 |
| Nitro+ 23.5.1 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 83044 | 41563 | 21065 | 30951 | 15342 | 6489 | 16803 |
| Nitro+ 23.5.2 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 81409 | 41148 | 20937 | 30881 | 15222 | 6453 | 16733 |
| Nitro+ 23.7.1 W10 Pro - New Ram 2 DR | 81958 | 41233 | 20992 | 30845 | 15216 | 6327 | 16365 |
I signed up for a Game pass 1 month trial and decided to give AC:Odyssey another go with my new GPU.
The benchmark results are looking really good:
My last GPU (RTX 3070) struggled with this title on pretty much any settings I tried.
Settings - 4K + Ultra preset, full screen mode, Windows 11 OS. The bottleneck seems to be on the CPU side (judging by the max CPU latency of 15ms), interestingly. I guess this is an example of where DX12 might improve performance further?
One thing I noticed is that the game doesn't like FPS caps much. Here, I had my cap set at 200 in Rivatuner. You can set a cap of 70, and the FPS dips aren't too bad, at least it didn't affect the 1% lows.
Maybe I'll give Valhalla a go if it goes onto Gamepass.
Has anyone else tried this game with a RX 7900 XT or XTX, and if so, does the game run well?
The benchmark results are looking really good:
My last GPU (RTX 3070) struggled with this title on pretty much any settings I tried.
Settings - 4K + Ultra preset, full screen mode, Windows 11 OS. The bottleneck seems to be on the CPU side (judging by the max CPU latency of 15ms), interestingly. I guess this is an example of where DX12 might improve performance further?
One thing I noticed is that the game doesn't like FPS caps much. Here, I had my cap set at 200 in Rivatuner. You can set a cap of 70, and the FPS dips aren't too bad, at least it didn't affect the 1% lows.
Maybe I'll give Valhalla a go if it goes onto Gamepass.
Has anyone else tried this game with a RX 7900 XT or XTX, and if so, does the game run well?
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2020
- Posts
- 1,462
Do you think AMD have much performance left untapped for RX 7900 series in future driver updates aka Fine Wine
Last edited:
I've put nearly 100 hours into AC Valhalla it looks lovely. The big but is that it needs a few things doing to stop it crashing a lot. The threads are full of crash rage rants but once you do a couple of things its fine. Its bad on Nvidia and intel aswell cheers UBI soft. This what I do to stop the crashing from bitter expierience.I signed up for a Game pass 1 month trial and decided to give AC:Odyssey another go with my new GPU.
The benchmark results are looking really good:
My last GPU (RTX 3070) struggled with this title on pretty much any settings I tried.
Settings - 4K + Ultra preset, full screen mode, Windows 11 OS. The bottleneck seems to be on the CPU side (judging by the max CPU latency of 15ms), interestingly. I guess this is an example of where DX12 might improve performance further?
One thing I noticed is that the g'veame doesn't like FPS caps much. Here, I had my cap set at 200 in Rivatuner. You can set a cap of 70, and the FPS dips aren't too bad, at least it didn't affect the 1% lows.
Maybe I'll give Valhalla a go if it goes onto Gamepass.
Has anyone else tried this game with a RX 7900 XT or XTX, and if so, does the game run well?
1. Cap fps to 75.
2. World clutter to high or medium.
3. Delete cache directorys before every game in ACV folder in documents.
4. In advanced AMD driver options reset shader cache before every game.
5. Even if you have the steam version launch it from UBIsoft connect.
*****************************
I've also got a silly undervolt and frequency cap on this game so the card sips juice.
Last edited:
Its true the drivers do get better and better with age. I'm sure theres still untaped performance.Do you think AMD have much performance left untapped for RX 7900 series in future driver updates aka Fine Wine
Last edited:
A significant amount of just a couple of percent? The performance gap between 6000 and 7000 top end cards isn't that big at the moment.
Associate
- Joined
- 22 Nov 2020
- Posts
- 1,462
But it is better (7900xt) for RT which is at 3090 level.
Also don’t forget there might be chance FSR 3.0 will lock out 6950xt etc. They seem to be following everything Nvidia is doing so don’t be surprised.