The Rangers Saga and Fallout Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Away game boycott next season? Poor East Stirling, Montrose, Elgin etc. Cant see what they have done wrong :p
And we will stand strong, go to these games and support our club.

Lets just see if your lot do the same with no big money deals, no old firm games and end up selling your own big name players.

We will be back winning the spl before you lot can even get close to our 54 titles strong.
 
And we will stand strong, go to these games and support our club.

Lets just see if your lot do the same with no big money deals, no old firm games and end up selling your own big name players.

We will be back winning the spl before you lot can even get close to our 54 titles strong.

Sure you will support your team, but there wont be 30k-40k to see Rangers vs any 3rd division team so your income will be that of a 1st Div team. Good luck adding to your titles.

It would be a shame if the SPL took all those tainted titles off you if the 2nd contract case indeed finds Rangers guilty. Might only take 3-4 seasons to surpass your total ;)

Anyways, all our titles have been won honestly. Something you cant say !
 
If they are in as a newco then the punishment still stands and the only way this is lifted is if they buy an existing league club to use their license (as Airdrie did to Clydebank). I'd be worried for any approach at takeovers in the coming months even the suspicious recent reports.

We've still got the EBT punishment to come (if any) from the SPL so it might be even worse than the 12-month transfer ban.
 
Good article in The Scottish Sun today from Bill Leckie.

McCoist wanting the names of the people responsible for the transfer embargo ruling and the SFA saying it was an independant panel. One of the current rules they got done for was a fine for £100k and expulsion from competition so they got off lightly.
 
Good article in The Scottish Sun today from Bill Leckie.

McCoist wanting the names of the people responsible for the transfer embargo ruling and the SFA saying it was an independant panel. One of the current rules they got done for was a fine for £100k and expulsion from competition so they got off lightly.

Its disgusting by McCoist, he had been dealing with it pretty well and with a bit of dignity until the last week, he's falling apart now. No way should the names of the panel be given out, they would be hounded, accused of being 'tarriers' or such like bigoted names.
 
McCoist is cracking up now. He needs to find another soundbite like "We dont do walking away" or he'll be stuffed :)

Clearly McCoist thinks the people on the panel were not impartial, but im pretty sure Billy McNeill, Win Jansen and Fegus McCann were totally professional :cool:
 
If Rangers fold - wouldn't it be great if all the fans started supporting Celtic as the only Glasgow side. It could be the end to all the sectarian bigotry on both sides.

It won't happen but it is a nice thought.
 
The decision will be overturned on appeal it was just produced now because Rangers administrators were finalising the offers, it had to be harsh enough to put off the potential bidders or made them reconsider. As soon as we are again near to having some sort of final offers SFA/SPL will announce something else.

We all know who's behind this and the honest Rangers fans (who have been totally blameless throughout this process) have had enough.

What's the point in fining a club before it's got an owner? What's the point in imposing a transfer embargo knowing full well that the players have clauses which entitle them to walk at the end of May? Like I said it was done with the sole purpose of stalling any potential bidders from finalising their deals.
 
It wont be overturned.

Rangers have an owner.

The transfer embargo is extremely fair given their wrongdoings in the transfer market and attempts to defraud other clubs of players knowing they couldnt pay for them.

Stop being so paranoid.
 
Question for the Rangers fans, do you actually believe (and I mean really believe not just mock outrage) that the club is being unfairly punished and the SFA are out to get them?

Do you think just because your club is big that it is exempt from being penalised?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom