• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The RT Related Games, Benchmarks, Software, Etc Thread.

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just think if I'm buying something brand new, I want the most years warranty/featuresets as a standard. Otherwise the more we let them get away with it, the more they can charge you more for higher 'tier' price brackets with features we should have got as standard. It's just scummy otherwise.

Pretty much my mindset, if you're paying £££(£), you save up a bit longer and pay a bit more to get the complete package by getting more and better features/options. Again, if you are absolutely NEVER going to use said features then yes, there is no point paying the extra and thanks to amds lack of uk store/msrp to grab 6800xt for msrp, I got the better overall package for cheaper.

For Fake Frame / Frame Generation, well let's just say those who keep saying the latency makes it a bad idea... with cloud gaming nobody can be sure the latency is their internet connection, Nvidia's servers, or something inherit with faking frames!

Nvidia provide monitoring tools to cover the server latency:

fXFsM7z.png



Basically it's the same as if I where playing a game on a server in bf, cod etc. i.e. 15-30ms depending on server.

Based on the ultimate package, you can definitely notice a slight latency hit with frame gen on when your fps is about 50-60 fps, with it off, the latency is pretty much not anymore noticeable than it would be on a MP server with a latency of 15-30ms. You obviously aren't going to use it with any MP gaming but for SP like cp 2077, the extra smoothness and better motion clarity far outweighs the slight increase in latency IMO.
 
Pretty much my mindset, if you're paying £££(£), you save up a bit longer and pay a bit more to get the complete package by getting more and better features/options. Again, if you are absolutely NEVER going to use said features then yes, there is no point paying the extra and thanks to amds lack of uk store/msrp to grab 6800xt for msrp, I got the better overall package for cheaper.



Nvidia provide monitoring tools to cover the server latency:

fXFsM7z.png



Basically it's the same as if I where playing a game on a server in bf, cod etc. i.e. 15-30ms depending on server.

Based on the ultimate package, you can definitely notice a slight latency hit with frame gen on when your fps is about 50-60 fps, with it off, the latency is pretty much not anymore noticeable than it would be on a MP server with a latency of 15-30ms. You obviously aren't going to use it with any MP gaming but for SP like cp 2077, the extra smoothness and better motion clarity far outweighs the slight increase in latency IMO.
Yeah I personally didn't mind paying a lil bit more just to get a better brand, that I personally have had good experience with that offers a 3 year warranty. I'll always take waiting another month or whatever over regretting it the next month.

For me though I'll never care who makes it, as with changing engines in cars, if it fits, does what I want/makes the power where I want to use it, it's going in, zero brand loyalty really, used to, not these days, both seem to be as bad as each other in their own ways!

Hence trying a brand new Nvidia card this time round!

Interesting about the GFN latency!
 
Last edited:
Basically it's the same as if I where playing a game on a server in bf, cod etc. i.e. 15-30ms depending on server.
Not really!
MP games dont wait for the server to show that you have moved :p

I think the orginal Quake did not have that feature (client prediction?) and so I vaguely remember a feeling like skating around when playing on a reasonably high ping. Quakeworld fixed this I believe. Where is the nearest GF Now server - London ? - showed as ~12ms latency when I checked it which isn't too bad.

Edit: According to NV status site it's London:

EU West [RTX 4080 Ready]

NP-LON-03 Operational

NP-LON-04 Operational

NP-LON-05 [RTX 4080] Operational

NP-LON-06 [RTX 4080] Operational
 
Last edited:
Not really!
MP games dont wait for the server to show that you have moved :p

I think the orginal Quake did not have that feature (client prediction?) and so I vaguely remember a feeling like skating around when playing on a reasonably high ping. Quakeworld fixed this I believe. Where is the nearest GF Now server - London ? - showed as ~12ms latency when I checked it which isn't too bad.

Edit: According to NV status site it's London:

EU West [RTX 4080 Ready]

NP-LON-03 Operational

NP-LON-04 Operational

NP-LON-05 [RTX 4080] Operational

NP-LON-06 [RTX 4080] Operational

Well it depends on the game when talking about MP servers i.e. client Vs server side. I would say the experience so far is far better than some of the servers I played on back in the bf 4 etc. days. Without frame gen and as long as FPS is above 60 fps along with a good server latency, you'll be very hard pressed to notice imo.

It's actually quite interesting as looking at Nvidias testing (since no one else has done their own latency testing....), you actually get less latency than you do with local console gaming (especially if the the game you're playing is locked to 30 FPS on console)
 
Just got in from a day out and in the graphics forum i see we are now loving on renting a rig. PC gaming is now doomed. I can't wait for the RTX7080 rig at £500 per month to play the enhanced edition of tetris. The more you subscribe the more you save. Lost for words.

£18, what have you got to lose to experience for yourself? Probably be an upgrade over your 7900xt in most games tbh :p

The ultimate tier is rated extremely highly by people who are on it (as long as your internet isn't peasant level) and some of the brief reviews (which are old and didn't have the higher bit rate and they had a preview/early version) even rated as being superior to local console gaming lol......




iwkRsr8.png


Still waiting to hear people slate how utterly awful netflix, disney and amazons streaming is given it is streaming at a considerably lower bit rate than ultimate ;)



Not sure why people are getting their panties in such a twist over it, because "nvidia bad!!!!!" again? :o

Beats paying £1000+ to play 1 game and sure as hells beats paying/rewarding amd for dated tech and well as shown, it is a hell of a lot better than console gaming lol.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: TNA
Still waiting to hear people slate how utterly awful netflix, disney and amazons streaming is given it is streaming at a considerably lower bit rate than ultimate ;)
Not saying it's awful. Saying its a compromise. RT requires currently requires expensive hardware, and I have no quibble with geforce offering a comparable experience - but I bet if you wanted to look you could find where the compromises are, same as Netflix/uhd.

It's not simply £18 per month. You need to have a pc to run it, which isn't free. You need quality Internet, as you said. The console will offer actual gameplay for less. The gpu will offer the top level for more. It's another compromise, which until relatively recently seemed to be unacceptable. This is probably where a lot of the pushback is from, taking the ability to customise your machine and gaming experience and locking it in to a subscription, at the end of which you own nothing.

The cost element is different for everyone, some will buy the best they can afford, some will look at value, and sadly some will buy beyond what they can afford. I'm not against geforce now, I'm not for it either. The point for me is that hardware is being priced to such a degree that this is necessary, the buliding of machines is becoming more and more prohibitive, and on a forum where this is kinda the reason for it's existence it feels like more of a nail in the coffin for that side of the hobby. Just lock people into a subscription and jack the prices before each shareholder meeting. If it works, then fine, we only have ourselves to blame. What happens if steam decide to start charging an "access fee"? We don't own any games on steam, either.

How do mods work on geforce now by the way? Can people still mod games? (No sarcasm, haven't looked yet)
 
Not saying it's awful. Saying its a compromise. RT requires currently requires expensive hardware, and I have no quibble with geforce offering a comparable experience - but I bet if you wanted to look you could find where the compromises are, same as Netflix/uhd.

It's not simply £18 per month. You need to have a pc to run it, which isn't free. You need quality Internet, as you said. The console will offer actual gameplay for less. The gpu will offer the top level for more. It's another compromise, which until relatively recently seemed to be unacceptable. This is probably where a lot of the pushback is from, taking the ability to customise your machine and gaming experience and locking it in to a subscription, at the end of which you own nothing.

The cost element is different for everyone, some will buy the best they can afford, some will look at value, and sadly some will buy beyond what they can afford. I'm not against geforce now, I'm not for it either. The point for me is that hardware is being priced to such a degree that this is necessary, the buliding of machines is becoming more and more prohibitive, and on a forum where this is kinda the reason for it's existence it feels like more of a nail in the coffin for that side of the hobby. Just lock people into a subscription and jack the prices before each shareholder meeting. If it works, then fine, we only have ourselves to blame. What happens if steam decide to start charging an "access fee"? We don't own any games on steam, either.

How do mods work on geforce now by the way? Can people still mod games? (No sarcasm, haven't looked yet)

My point wasn't really aimed at you but at others who stated about "not lowering their standards" ;)

Well yeah of course there are compromises, as is with anything in life, the main compromises with the geforce now ultimate is:

- time limit, 8 hours a day, personally not a problem for me as no way I'm playing 8 hours a day on any game, regardless of local or cloud streaming
- it's reliant on good internet
- your library is limited, as in only games that are on geforce now can be used so no hogwarts, rdr 2 for example, although given microsoft have partnered with nvidia here, this will probably drastically improve especially if you have gamepass ultimate (which I do)
- nvidia decide which games can be streamed in hdr, not all can be even if the game supports it
- if nvidia are doing maintenance, no access to said games

Who doesn't have a device where you can access geforce now? One of the pros for this is it provides people who use laptops or macs but want to game, well now they can get a "similar" experience as if they were on a powerful local gaming rig, you can even play on your smartphone if you really wanted.....

As said, based on having a decent gaming pc and having access to this and based purely on cp 2077 path tracing, one provides a considerably superior experience in terms of visual fidelity, latency and performance, oh and did I mention, no electricity use thus no fans spinning at all.

People can read here from various types of users to see that the ultimate package is rated pretty highly:


It's absolutely pointless people taking their opinion on the geforce free and even premium tier then applying it to the ultimate tier as they are not the same, not to mention, even sillier to be basing it on other providers cloud game streaming given geforce now ultimate as evidenced is on another level compared to them.

Essentially, it's another "option" for consumers, don't like it and want to experience top tier gaming performance especially for path tracing? Well then be prepared to pay ££££ and watch as those prices fall of a cliff come the next gen gpu release.

I can understand the concern of raising prices but lets be realistic here, it's just silly to be saying "£700 a month", given, netflix, amazon etc. have all reported a significant amount of cancellations due to cost of living and the increased prices on their end..... At worst, if more and more go this way and nvidia invest more money into it, we may see prices go up to something similar to internet provider prices and this is where if you feel so strongly about, you simply vote with your wallet but alas as shown on this forum, people whinge all the time then they go and reward/pay Jenson and Lisa :o




As for mods, this is another con, however, if the game is on steam and through the mod workshop, I believe this is possible.
 
last 5 single players games I played none of them are on Geforce now :eek:

Yup, hoping it will improve:


Microsoft and NVIDIA today announced the companies have agreed to a 10-year partnership to bring Xbox PC games to the NVIDIA® GeForce NOW™ cloud gaming service, which has more than 25 million members in over 100 countries.

The agreement will enable gamers to stream Xbox PC titles from GeForce NOW to PCs, macOS, Chromebooks, smartphones and other devices. It will also enable Activision Blizzard PC titles, such as Call of Duty, to be streamed on GeForce NOW after Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision closes.

“Xbox remains committed to giving people more choice and finding ways to expand how people play,” said Microsoft Gaming CEO Phil Spencer. “This partnership will help grow NVIDIA’s catalog of titles to include games like Call of Duty, while giving developers more ways to offer streaming games. We are excited to offer gamers more ways to play the games they love.”

“Combining the incredibly rich catalog of Xbox first party games with GeForce NOW’s high-performance streaming capabilities will propel cloud gaming into a mainstream offering that appeals to gamers at all levels of interest and experience,” said Jeff Fisher, senior vice president for GeForce at NVIDIA. “Through this partnership, more of the world’s most popular titles will now be available from the cloud with just a click, playable by millions more gamers.”

The partnership delivers increased choice to gamers and resolves NVIDIA’s concerns with Microsoft’s acquisition of Activision Blizzard. NVIDIA therefore is offering its full support for regulatory approval of the acquisition.

As said, I'll only be using it purely for the demanding/path tracing titles.
 
For those interested, 3080 with "appropriate" and somewhat playable settings (using dlss performance) compared to geforce now ultimate/4080 (can use dlss balanced here instead). Obviously got youtube compression so not going to get a full idea on IQ especially since video was only recorded at 50Mbps but gives you an idea on the performance and hopefully can see somewhat of a difference in smoothness, although again, limited to 60 fps on a video......

 
Still waiting to hear people slate how utterly awful netflix, disney and amazons streaming is given it is streaming at a considerably lower bit rate than ultimate ;)

Well I don't see how they are comparable but I did everntually try the free tier. Not sure if it's much better on the paid tiers as it was mediocre if I am honest. I'm not sure if it was the frame rate or the latency or a combination of both but it was not very responsive. Admittedly I was testing Doom Eternal which is probably a worst case scenario for SP games via internet latency :p Was a 1060 tier GPU according to Doom Eternal.

In some repects the latency reminded me of frame generation latency so now I am curious how having that on top will affect the experience, maybe I'll compare the real 4080 with a cloud 4080 at some point.
 
Well I don't see how they are comparable but I did everntually try the free tier. Not sure if it's much better on the paid tiers as it was mediocre if I am honest. I'm not sure if it was the frame rate or the latency or a combination of both but it was not very responsive. Admittedly I was testing Doom Eternal which is probably a worst case scenario for SP games via internet latency :p Was a 1060 tier GPU according to Doom Eternal.

In some repects the latency reminded me of frame generation latency so now I am curious how having that on top will affect the experience, maybe I'll compare the real 4080 with a cloud 4080 at some point.

Bit rate is largely compression related and has a big impact on IQ especially in dark areas where compression artifacts are most noticeable - Essentially lower bitrate means more data is thrown away, so a lower bitrate means you get more compression artifacts. Netflix, amazon and disney stream at 15-25Mbps, which is a significant drop, geforce now ultimate is streaming at 75Mbps, which is similar to an untouched UHD film playing via your blu ray player or being streamed via your media server, obviously different content but the way it works is pretty similar. A good guide on recording gameplay for example:


5vCYMkA.png


As mentioned above, the free tier is not anywhere comparable to the ultimate tier in any way whatsoever, there is more to it than just the gpu spec:

- free tier is limited to 60 fps/60hz, ultimate goes up to 120hz/fps, in fact, free tier might even be limited to less than 60/60z as the priority tier is advertised as having up to 60 fps
- ultimate supports hdr
- ultimate supports res up to 4k and ultrawide
- ultimate has its own dedicated servers
- ultimate allows up to 75Mbps bit rate streaming, not sure what the free one is limited to but it is most likely no more than 20Mbps
- reflex is not available on the free tier thus you are getting a significant amount of latency by not having that

You can turn on an overlay to see latency etc. for yourself, ctrl n.

nH1mdGC.png


iwkRsr8.png


Latency is negligible based on my testing in cyberpunk and with frame gen on, then I can notice the slight increase in latency but if having a higher base fps i.e. say switching to dlss performance then this reduces latency further, this is using a m +k too, if using controller, probably wouldn't even notice it with frame gen on and again, it all beats local console gaming.....
 
Bit rate is largely compression related and has a big impact on IQ especially in dark areas where compression artifacts are most noticeable - Essentially lower bitrate means more data is thrown away, so a lower bitrate means you get more compression artifacts. Netflix, amazon and disney stream at 15-25Mbps, which is a significant drop, geforce now ultimate is streaming at 75Mbps, which is similar to an untouched UHD film playing via your blu ray player or being streamed via your media server, obviously different content but the way it works is pretty similar.
Streaming services dont need to be at 120fps so obviously don't need ridiculous bitrates. Personally I didn't have any issues with the bitrate as it's obviously not going to be great on the free tier and 75Mbps sounds like plenty. It was more the latency and the 'up to 60fps'. It certainly did not feel like 60 fps in my test but I guess I could test streaming across home network instead of coughing up the 18 quid :p
 
Streaming services dont need to be at 120fps so obviously don't need ridiculous bitrates. Personally I didn't have any issues with the bitrate as it's obviously not going to be great on the free tier and 75Mbps sounds like plenty. It was more the latency and the 'up to 60fps'. It certainly did not feel like 60 fps in my test but I guess I could test streaming across home network instead of coughing up the 18 quid :p

Bit rate is more for the IQ side and to try and ensure you are not getting compression artifacts e.g. during covid lockdown when netflix were throttling the bit rate because of higher demand, even just going from 20+ to 10Mbps was a very noticeable loss in iq especially in darker scenes on oled but it's certainly not bad/unusable.

But yes the main thing that would be impacting the latency is lack of reflex, low FPS and not having dedicated/premium servers. What was the latency being recorded with free tier on your system?
 
There's nothing quite like waiting for a 720P YouTube video to buffer every 2-3 minutes, The rush of danger when I press play, Will it buffer, Will it not, Makes me feel like Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible !

Everytime I press play, the MI theme starts playing in my head.
 
Last edited:
There's nothing quite like waiting for a 720P YouTube video to buffer every 2-3 minutes, The rush of danger when I press play, Will it buffer, Will it not, Makes me feel like Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible !

Everytime I press play, the MI theme starts playing in my head.
You mean, the MI theme tries to play then buffers? :cry:

If you really want to play with fire try confusing it more and skipping it to various points back and forth, it'll love that!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom