Soldato
Tried CP2077 with the newer 2.3.5 DLL from Horizon Zero Dawn, Works nicely.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The RT Related Games, Benchmarks, Software, Etc Thread.
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
- Status
That shimmering with FSR
DLSS improves upon native IQ, meanwhile FSR downgrades the IQ further.....
This is exactly the issue/experience I have with FSR, if the games native AA/TAA is **** then FSR is going to enhance the native AA/TAA issues even further, especially since they vastly over sharpen with their method.
Soldato
Did HZD at 5K max settings using the DLSS Quality setting with a 3080 Ti, Quite impressed -
Last edited:
Caporegime
Oh yes. Can’t wait for it^^
Very nice
Not "RTX" footage but very good look at dying light 2 gameplay, sooooo looking forward to this:
Soldato
^^
Very nice
Not "RTX" footage but very good look at dying light 2 gameplay, sooooo looking forward to this:
Maybe no RTX but I can see them adding in Nvidia features like HBAO+, PCSS, NVDOF etc... like they did for Dying Light 1.
Soldato
Really hope that is before DLSS is used.
Caporegime
I know right. That means the 3090 can’t even do 1440p if you want to play it maxed out
Pretty sure it is. Basically means for say 4K players you need to stick it on performance mode.
If I am not able to secure one of the new Super cards coming out before the release of the game I still think with a few tweaks to settings and DLSS on performance mode I will be fine playing it at 4K with my 3070.
I say wait and see, remember FC 6 recommended specs and how it ran very well in the end.
Given all the ray tracing effects in this, I am expecting it to be very demanding though, so suspect if I'm playing at 4k, I might use dlss performance/balanced to achieve locked 60 or if playing at 1440 then dlss quality/balanced to achieve 90+ fps with tweaked/optimised settings.
Given all the ray tracing effects in this, I am expecting it to be very demanding though, so suspect if I'm playing at 4k, I might use dlss performance/balanced to achieve locked 60 or if playing at 1440 then dlss quality/balanced to achieve 90+ fps with tweaked/optimised settings.
Last edited:
Soldato
I know right. That means the 3090 can’t even do 1440p if you want to play it maxed out
Pretty sure it is. Basically means for say 4K players you need to stick it on performance mode.
If I am not able to secure one of the new Super cards coming out before the release of the game I still think with a few tweaks to settings and DLSS on performance mode I will be fine playing it at 4K with my 3070.
Well the Super cards aren't going to be anything special, 10% more cores and a bit more memory on the 3080 from "leaks", Best off saving your dosh for around Q4 when the next proper series is out.
Caporegime
Typically I would. But the fact I could sell my 3070 to CEX for silly money also and people would also likely pay silly money for a card with more vram come next year, I feel it makes sense. Would also get a new toy to play with
Also the other kids are making fun of me for only having 8gb vram @gpuerrilla @LtMatt so at least it will solve that issue too
If I get the 3070 Ti 16GB for example that would mean I would even be in profit after selling my 3070 to CEX. At todays price they offer anyway.
Soldato
Typically I would. But the fact I could sell my 3070 to CEX for silly money also and people would also likely pay silly money for a card with more vram come next year, I feel it makes sense. Would also get a new toy to play with
Valid reason
Caporegime
Valid reason
Yet another dlss vs fsr vs nis video!!!!!
I'm a big fan of dlss, allows higher visual settings to be used all round especially RT and often better than native IQ if the games default AA is awful, however, as called out when this tech first came out (and got good with dlss 2.0), a lot of developers are falling back on them to not optimise their games to the same extent now
Screw all this DLSS and FSR stuff, I want to run native resolution
To be honest I can't wait until the 4080, the 3080 is not cutting it for me anymore especially with RT you have to use DLSS which I'm not a fan of.
I'm a big fan of dlss, allows higher visual settings to be used all round especially RT and often better than native IQ if the games default AA is awful, however, as called out when this tech first came out (and got good with dlss 2.0), a lot of developers are falling back on them to not optimise their games to the same extent now
Caporegime
Yep. I was not a fan off DLSS 1.0 but they took a big step with 2.0 and now with 2.3 where they have mostly solved the ghosting issue it just keeps getting better. Just imagine how good DLSS 3.0 will be which I assume will be released with the 4000 series.Yet another dlss vs fsr vs nis video!!!!!
I'm a big fan of dlss, allows higher visual settings to be used all round especially RT and often better than native IQ if the games default AA is awful, however, as called out when this tech first came out (and got good with dlss 2.0), a lot of developers are falling back on them to not optimise their games to the same extent now
- Status