• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

The RX Vega 56 Owners Thread

Right guys and girls

I have sold my second machine to a friend and have the money to pick up a 1440p freesync 31.5" panel

Who is running a 56 @ 1440p and does it still handle the job ok?

My spec is in my signature and I am running the card Undervolted and lightly clocked the HBM (900) and according to gpu-z I am at 488gb/sec so up near 64 figures

Little bit of me is "buy a 5700xt" but the Vega has been so, so good

Im running mine on a 1440/144hz panel, it handles things absolutely fine. Had to turn down the odd setting in the division2 for example, but i was still well above the 60fps.
 
Im running mine on a 1440/144hz panel, it handles things absolutely fine. Had to turn down the odd setting in the division2 for example, but i was still well above the 60fps.

Cool, thank you

Intention would be to get a Freesync 75Hz panel so that sounds like should be fine. Obviously you have a "bit" more grunt with your monster 3900x lol
 
Cool, thank you

Intention would be to get a Freesync 75Hz panel so that sounds like should be fine. Obviously you have a "bit" more grunt with your monster 3900x lol

I got Lucky with the 3900x and got it for a ridiculously low price.

The Vega56 will be fine for quite some time yet, i do want an upgrade just to give me that more oomph when playing FPS games as you want to get close to the 144fps.
 
I am Undervolted and have the increased limit enabled and as mentioned I am up from 410gb/sec to 488gb/sec if that is knocking me up towards 2070 then as you say there is little point in forking out the £200+ required over selling the VEGA to go 5700 series

Health wise I am always under 70deg at full load and not hammering the power circuits because of the lowered voltage

No you need to download power play mods to get upto that level or performance, more info if interested



 
Not really worth modding the card, draws way too much power. Just overclocking the core/memory to say 1600~ and 950~ and undervolting close to 1v will give stock 64/1080/2060+ performance at 180-200w. Good enough for me at 1440p 144hz, most games I can run at a mix of ultra/high with 100 or so fps.
 
That's what I needed to hear, cheers. I am around 1570- 1600 boost clock under load and the memory will do 950mhz happily as it's reference with Samsung HBM. From memory the voltage is 1080mv at present on my Undervolted settings

If that's enough that's good with me
 
Right guys and girls

I have sold my second machine to a friend and have the money to pick up a 1440p freesync 31.5" panel

Who is running a 56 @ 1440p and does it still handle the job ok?

My spec is in my signature and I am running the card Undervolted and lightly clocked the HBM (900) and according to gpu-z I am at 488gb/sec so up near 64 figures

Little bit of me is "buy a 5700xt" but the Vega has been so, so good

i've got mine running three 1080p monitors in portrait mode and it runs them pretty well, gears I was getting around 55-62 frames per second. I've not played it this week so need to spend some time to fiddle with it a bit to get it stable, but I'm happy with the results.
 
So just a little background. I've previously posted on this forum when i had a gigabyte vega56, well in the last few weeks that bit the dust with artifacting and code43. Because I am a tight git I like to browse for parts and not working on a certain website. I managed to pick up a Asus strix vega56 with "crashing during benchmark problems". I took the plunge a bought the thing at the same cost as what I sold my previous card at.

Well i am reasonably pleased with my purchase. Yes it crashes on benchmark at stock, however I found if i downclock the HBM to 770mhz it works fine.

So Pros:

It works albeit HBM downclocked
It has nice RGB
It looks brand spanking new
It has a moulded core
It has the updated Heatsink/VRM thingy
It preforms benchmark wise roughly same as my old card
IT DOESN'T BLACK SCREEN CRASH (Huzzah)
It doesn't have coil whine

Cons:

Something is wrong with it clearly, so longevity of card
My OCD at not having HBM at stock or overclocked

My question to you wise people is "i wonder what is wrong with this card?" - "will it work in long term?" - "i wonder if there is a fix?".

So overall i'm pretty stoked as at the moment i'm not out of pocket, your thoughts please.

So following on from this story. I just changed the VRM thermal pad for a grizzly 3mm thick one and for some reason the card now works absolutely faultlessly. Just ran 15 mins of Heaven at 870mhz HBM. I don't really understand what has happened, my thermals were decent in the first place and the VRM only reaching 70 odd degrees C. They now sit at 60-65 degrees C. Maybe i just bent the card in the right way putting it back together :p
 
So following on from this story. I just changed the VRM thermal pad for a grizzly 3mm thick one and for some reason the card now works absolutely faultlessly. Just ran 15 mins of Heaven at 870mhz HBM. I don't really understand what has happened, my thermals were decent in the first place and the VRM only reaching 70 odd degrees C. They now sit at 60-65 degrees C. Maybe i just bent the card in the right way putting it back together :p

Well done and congrats. Could it be the card throttled itself when reaching 70c at certain speeds and cut out as a fail safety measure? And now you've changed the thermal pads it's fixed?

I hope I never have this situation as I don't think I'm technical enough to do what you've managed
 
Well done and congrats. Could it be the card throttled itself when reaching 70c at certain speeds and cut out as a fail safety measure? And now you've changed the thermal pads it's fixed?

I hope I never have this situation as I don't think I'm technical enough to do what you've managed

I think it was sheer blind luck as i have killed as many cards as repaired them :)

Im never going to open it up again now haha. I've run more stress tests this morning and completed a firestrike run with a 22000 score. Just need to play some games now.
 
Now I've had chance to play with the Asus Strix I must say I am pleased in comparison to the previous Gigabyte version I owned. I have now manage to OC the HBM to 955mhz on the asus card compared to 860mhz on the Gigabyte. Other positives include the lack of coil whine and also the absence of any 100% fan black screen crashes which plagued me for a year with the gigabyte version.

In defence of the gigabyte card I believe the cooling solution is superior. Not only do you not have to buy 3rd party heatpads to make the card work, but the fans are quieter at the same RPM in general. Also I think overall the card also ran cooler.

I like the RGB on the asus card, its really the only bling i have. Though there doesnt seem to be a option to turn it off beyond unplugging the connector.
 
Last edited:
Can anyone advise if the intermittent black screens with Freesync enabled issue has been fixed yet? The monitor will go black and takes 5-10 seconds to start displaying again. Happens randomly across all three screens at different times. Cables have been swapped etc.

I've got a launch day Vega 56 which I pulled out of the rig back in April for a couple of reasons :
1) The black screens episodes. When you're playing an online racing sim and the centre screen goes off it's a problem.
2) AMD driver issues. Took AMD and the game developer 6 months to fix a game breaking bug.

I bought a 1070 as a get me by card for some endurance racing ... and it's still in. If the Freesync issues are fixed then I'll look at putting the Vega back in, otherwise it's getting sold on.
 
Back
Top Bottom