Lol you have 1% lows as big as their average frame rate on 6800xt.Also this is how perform against 3090 at valhalla with Sam
BTW now are you convinced that the 6900xt was power limited?
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The thread which sometimes talks about RDNA2
- Thread starter CAT-THE-FIFTH
- Start date
- Status
BTW now are you convinced that the 6900xt was power limited?
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Dec 2020
- Posts
- 73
Lol you have 1% lows as big as their average frame rate on 6800xt.
But only for one of the best case scenario
%37 improvement at Zero dawn.
That's both fine wine and a Christmas miracle!But only for one of the best case scenario
%37 improvement at Zero dawn.
I asked you about the 6900xt, i've seen you talked with an ( red devil maybe? ) owner on another forum which i am not sure we can mention here and he said he went all the way up to 500W
I told you before that the card needs more power, let's hope now he will find the right balance to show us some records.
Found another one on hwbot - FS ultra and that one is on stock cooling. All 3090s around him are on LN2 and the other 6900xt is on chiller.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Dec 2020
- Posts
- 73
That's both fine wine and a Christmas miracle!
I asked you about the 6900xt, i've seen you talked with an ( red devil maybe? ) owner on another forum which i am not sure we can mention here and he said he went all the way up to 500W
I told you before that the card needs more power, let's hope now he will find the right balance to show us some records.
I saw one at guru3d forum today who reached 500w but i doubt he can get records. He said -21c and 2850mhz. Good binned gpu but not the best i guess.
Here is some runs of him at various fire strike:
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/24454850
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/24453884
https://www.3dmark.com/fs/24453777
- Joined
- 9 Nov 2009
- Posts
- 25,339
- Location
- Planet Earth
Thanks. Also it appears SAM can work on Zen2!
https://twitter.com/IanCutress/status/1337423558042120194?s=20
Dr Ian Cutress said:
Oh so he is on Asrock. Yeah so the best cards seem to be that freaking Red Devil and most likely the ASUS LC when available. I think they can kill some 3090s on other benchmarks too.
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Dec 2020
- Posts
- 73
Oh so he is on Asrock. Yeah so the best cards seem to be that freaking Red Devil and most likely the ASUS LC when available. I think they can kill some 3090s on other benchmarks too.
Maybe, But why 6900xt perform so poor at time spy? If there is no limit for 6800xt maybe i can even beat all of the 6900xt. That's how poor their scores. Also why hwbot has different rules and settings while they can use standart 3dmark? I can't compere results just because of that
Edit: @Port royal also not good enough.
Well HU commented on one of their Q&As that AMD may not get a DLSS equivalent out until their refresh, perhaps a year away. For a new card it's been very quiet.
The negative feedback about rt you are ignoring. People are objecting to your bias claims and telling you that the game fine without rt ,for example. And showing you how pointless some elements are like shadows.
The more you keep defending nvidia implimentation of fake rt the more you expose your own bias. The pics you've posted are not revolutionary nor evolutionary. And they are suppose to have 5 elements of ray tracing in them. Looks like they need to add another 5 more element.
Again, thats for proving my point.b
Rofl
I never once said the game isn't great without RT. What I am claiming is that it adds another level of immersion. At times it no longer looks like the legacy flat world with cardboard cut outs that we have got used to once you turn on RT. Shadows add depth to a scene when done correctly. How can shadows be pointless? I'm not defending Nvidia's implementation of RT, I'm saying how good RT is in this game. You're just having a tantrum due to only Nvidia having the RT performance to do this ATM.
How can more physically correct lighting not be revolutionary and evolutionary? Do you game with 100p, 2 bit colour, no AA, etc. due to any upgrades in the last ~35 years not being revolutionary and evolutionary?
Maybe Apple, AMD, Intel, Micorsoft, Nvidia and Sony got it wrong, while you remain the modern day graphics messiah
People dismissed Hardware T&L when it first came out
People dismissed Pixel Shaders when they first came out
People dismissed Pixel Shader 2.0 when it first came out because it was extremely slow unless you had a Radeon 9800 pro
People dismissed Tessellation when it first came out because Nvidia were so much better at it
All these features/techniques ended up being in almost every single mainstream game.
RT and some form of AI upscaling will follow the same route but there will always be people who are short sighted and don't realise that the world moves on past the present time. They don't seem to grasp that these features evolve and become mainstream and are eventually used in the majority of games. Currently they are new, still in their infancy, but they need to start somewhere just like all the other features that are now so common they're not even given a second thought...
People dismissed Pixel Shaders when they first came out
People dismissed Pixel Shader 2.0 when it first came out because it was extremely slow unless you had a Radeon 9800 pro
People dismissed Tessellation when it first came out because Nvidia were so much better at it
All these features/techniques ended up being in almost every single mainstream game.
RT and some form of AI upscaling will follow the same route but there will always be people who are short sighted and don't realise that the world moves on past the present time. They don't seem to grasp that these features evolve and become mainstream and are eventually used in the majority of games. Currently they are new, still in their infancy, but they need to start somewhere just like all the other features that are now so common they're not even given a second thought...
Yes, in the future RT will be done well and we will have the hardware to make it worthwhile.
That won't be any time soon tho. The current gen consoles have anaemic RT capability, and even 3000 series top cards can't do it at high res+high FPS.
It's one for the future.
Associate
- Joined
- 18 Dec 2020
- Posts
- 73
He 's not happy with 3000mhz and He doesn't even know that the max speed actually 2950mhz
@CAT-THE-FIFTH Spot on
He 's not happy with 3000mhz and He doesn't even know that the max speed actually 2950mhz
He's mad that it aucks for LN2 overclocking - that's his thing, when you hit the arbritrary software limit with water it makes LN2 magic speed juice useless
For me the worst thing AMD did with the 6900xt is the 2x8 power connector and the cooling. I understand there are people who are going full LN2 but i am more impressed with the performance on air or water since it is a little hard to play games while you pour LN2 on your card.
I think the MBA 6900xt and the AIB's with 2x8 pins, have trouble reaching even 2.8 Ghz even if you take them to space to cool them because there isn't enough power on these cards.
LN2 looks nice for world records but that's all, if a regular person is buying a card because it does well on LN2, he is insane.
Soldato
- Joined
- 21 Jul 2005
- Posts
- 20,710
- Location
- Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
Checked in here, hard to spot the quality with the tit for tat bickering, great thread title now though!
- Status